reanjr said:I has nothing to do with danger. Rather it has to do with deterrance. There are many laws in America designed to have strict punishment not to fit the crime, but to deter a crime that is difficult to pursue or prosecute. Hate crimes is a good example. Murder is murder. But if you murder someone because thay are of a different race, you will find yourself in prison for a significantly longer period of time in most states. In other states, you may be more likely to suffer capital punishment for such a crime. Much of this is common law, but it is a well-accepted practice in the American justice system.
I hope this doesn't end up being interepreted as a political post, but i find this threat of persecution disturbing when it is combined with the fact that copywrites are being extended into infinity, and corporations are doing their damndest to make sure NOTHING ever ends up public domain again.
As an issue, whether political or legal or what have you, it is not clear cut. Copyright was intended to give the creator of a work the chance to make fair profit from his intellectual property, not to end up permanently hampering distribution of a work. That's why it used to be that copyright would expire about 15 years after the original author was dead. Now a trust made up of the authors descendants (at best, or just a managing corporation with no direct connection to the author, at worst) can keep churning profits from the copyright for 75 years, and rising. So if you add to that the risk that people will actually be put in prison for sharing a .pdf it becomes very disturbing, to me at least.
Nisarg