Ilbranteloth
Explorer
Interesting exercise in terms of entertainment, but the boundaries are entirely subjective and no two gamers will agree.
For example, the OP distinguishes between Sorcerer and Wizard as one being wise & old, and the other being young with poor self-control. And yet if you tried to define two separate rogue-like classes based on this distinction I think most people would say that's a matter of RP and backround, or maybe sub-class distinction.
That said, for me the only missing space is the shaman/witchdoctor/witchspiritualist. Sure, that could be Druid or Cleric sub-class, but (without going into the specific reasons) I find neither of those satisfactory.
I'm believe 100% that the "warlord" concept is not a class but a "build" that should be applicable to any class.
I think the warlock is a better starting point for a shaman myself.