Exactly this. I'd be a bit put out if DnDbeyond was owned by WotC but since this isn't the case I'm fine with it.Yes, I'm perfectly fine with it. Because I'm not paying the same company twice for the same product, I'm paying two separate companies for two separate products (both of which have similar stuff in them.)
If I didn't want both products, I wouldn't have bought them.
Dndbeyond isn’t equivalent to owning a pdf. Even if you only ever use the compendium, the compendium is much better than a pdf. I can search all 5e products for every wondrous item on dndbeyond. Or every magic weapon of a given rarity. Or a specific magic item that I don’t know the source of.It's been three years since D&D Beyond launched and I see many people, here and elsewhere, gladly pay for the physical copy of a release and then again for the virtual copy.
There are companies 1/100th the size of WotC that will gladly provide a virtual copy of the physical book you bought for free, and have been doing it for years (Not to mention they're generally normal PDFs that aren't tied to a service).
My question is this: is the consensus that this is fine and normal and the other publishers are wrong or should we be banging a drum about how this is a anti-consumer practice?
The “books” isn’t all DDB provides.This is why I don't pay for D&D Beyond. It's a product that doesn't fit my needs, since I already bought the books.
To be fair, I never ran a game online before the isolation orders, but use ddb at every session. To each their own, of course.Nope, and I don’t buy books on dnd beyond. Maybe if I regularly ran games online I’d consider it, but I prefer in-person anyway, so physical books are sufficient for me.
Oh, yeah, it is very useful even for in-person games. Just not worth the price tag for me.To be fair, I never ran a game online before the isolation orders, but use ddb at every session. To each their own, of course.
AWESOME! I didn't know that existed. Thanks for the link!
I promise you it's not. You mean something else. Anti-consumerism is about the acquisition of goods and wealth at the expense of society. It's about ethics and the environment and stuff.Sure it is.
When I buy a PDF from Drivethru and download it, it's mine forever.
When you buy a book on Beyond or one of those other VTTs it's yours as long as they find it worth their while to exist.
You used to own a thing forever, now you don't. Who benefits? The consumer?
It's been three years since D&D Beyond launched and I see many people, here and elsewhere, gladly pay for the physical copy of a release and then again for the virtual copy.
There are companies 1/100th the size of WotC that will gladly provide a virtual copy of the physical book you bought for free, and have been doing it for years (Not to mention they're generally normal PDFs that aren't tied to a service).
My question is this: is the consensus that this is fine and normal and the other publishers are wrong or should we be banging a drum about how this is a anti-consumer practice?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.