Relax. I wasn't "bashing".
My point (which I could have phrased better) was this: Lucas's recent work, while admirable, would be lacking without it's technological wizardry. SFX aside, his direction and storytelling is simply *not as good* as some of his earlier works. Is it *bad*? No. But you have to admit that CGI does most of the heavy lifting nowadays.
You are correct about 'A New Hope'. Even if the SFX weren't half as good as they were, the story, characters and setting would make it a masterpiece.
The reason I picked 'American Grafitti' was because that film relied on superbly capable storytelling and an honest love of setting, unburdned with fancy special effects.
As a DM, Lucas would not have an ILM team backing him up. He would have to simply tell the story and somehow invest us in it. 'American Grafitti' and 'A New Hope' Lucas could do that. I'm not sure that today's version could.