HeapThaumaturgist said:Oddly, I think I agree with Bob on this'un.
*is shocked and amazed that I FINALLY said something right*
HeapThaumaturgist said:Oddly, I think I agree with Bob on this'un.
werk said:I'm reading it as a paladinish version of true strike.
pbd said:Ha ha! Here is where it gets even better; the caster does not have to be a Paladin. It is the 5th level glory domain spell...
pbd said:It makes more sense as the Paladin's version of true strike if only paladins can cast it....
Bard: I have a plan. Now that we're out of sight, I cast disguise self on you.LordBOB said:Fighter : hey PALLY can you cast Holy sword on my sword?
PALLY : Sure dude I'll cast it on "YOUR" sword
FireLance said:Bard: I have a plan. Now that we're out of sight, I cast disguise self on you.
Fighter: Disguise self. The spell is named disguise SELF.
Bard: Right. So I just disguise yourself.
Names have been removed to protect the identities of the speakers![]()
werk said:As written:
Holy Sword
Evocation [Good]
Level: Pal 4
I said paladin-ish. I would think the glory domain would also be paladinish.
I still don't really see the point you are trying to make?
FireLance said:Bard: I have a plan. Now that we're out of sight, I cast disguise self on you.
Fighter: Disguise self. The spell is named disguise SELF.
Bard: Right. So I just disguise yourself.
pbd said:Disguise self: range = personal
Holy sword: range = touch