CreamCloud0
Hero
I feel like I’ve got thoughts but I’m too tired to properly put them together right now, maybe tomorrow.
I don't agree. I think you require it that way so you find it fun. More complex exploration rules can be just as fun if you appreciate more granularity in that area. My wife, for example, is an amateur survivalist, and rules that emphasize that aspect get a thumbs-up from her (and from me).I ran Abomination vaults for a little bit as a method to learn PF2E, and found that the the complex rules made dungeon delving a chore. I ran and played in a 5E Rappan Athuk game with similar results, plus incongruities of matching that system to old school sensibilities. There were other attempts at dungeon crawling with PF1 and 3.x era D&D, all failures to some degree or another.
Upon discovering 5 Torches Deep, Shadowdark and other rules light D&D inspired games, i have come to the conclusion that dungeon crawling requires a rules light approach in order to be fun. Unwieldy, complex systems are slow, and turn the crawl into a grind. The juice isn't worth the squeeze, as the saying goes.
Do you agree? What are your thoughts on dungeon crawling versus rules complexity?
See, I really want that feeling when I'm in a dungeon, otherwise it feels to me like a sport.Depends on what you consider dungeon crawling. If it’s the actual searching, avoiding traps, mapping, getting lost, dealing with light and having to track resources portion of dungeon crawling, I agree. Conversely, I played through Dungeon of the Mad Mage with 5e and we essentially passed over the aforementioned nitty gritty of dungeon crawling and the dungeon became largely the setting for the adventure, but it still played wonderfully with plenty of traps, strange things to interact with and obviously plenty of encounters. But because we were 5e characters, there wasn’t the same threat of “death waits around every corner if you aren’t cautious” feeling.
Again, for you. Broad, sweeping statements about what's fun and what isn't IMO really need to be called out as subjective.Absolutely agree. Though I’d go a big step further. RPGs as a whole require lighter rules to be fun. Unwieldy, complex systems are slow and turn the whole game into a boring grind.
IME, player really balk every time a mechanic like supply dice doesn't go their way. It tends not to be worth it IMO.Can you do dungeon crawling without resource management? I don't think you can.
I don't think you need rules for describing things. What would that look like?
Again, how do you dungeon crawl without obstacles and hazards?
I am not really talking about eliminating important aspects of dungeon crawling to make the game lighter, I am talking about building systems that are concise and quickly resolved but still essential. Things like slot encumbrance is a good example, as are supply dice.
I will say PF2 is far too gamey for my tastes anyway, dungeon delving or not, so I agree with you there.My players bounced off exploration activities, and I did not take to tags/traits as well as I imagined I might. Overall, the quantity of moving parts in PF2E was just too much for me, and the exploration suffered more than the combat. I gave it an honest go, but couldn't last long enough to get proficient.
so what are you doing instead then, tracking supplies or handwaving them away? I assume tracking…IME, player really balk every time a mechanic like supply dice doesn't go their way. It tends not to be worth it IMO.
Tracking, yup.so what are you doing instead then, tracking supplies or handwaving them away? I assume tracking…