I've always defined an 8 in CHA as being how a geek comes across to a 'normal' person
Who are you talking about here?Angcuru said:I just don't understand you people who want to play underpowered characters. If someone is below average in their abilities, they usually don't decide to take up a life of adventuring.
I have I am sure several 8 in stats but that doesn't stop me from living my life to the fullest. I am an over weight out of shape guy who still does lots of things with my life.Angcuru said:I just don't understand you people who want to play underpowered characters. If someone is below average in their abilities, they usually don't decide to take up a life of adventuring.
Jenale said:Probably referring to those (like me) who wax nostalgic over a character with a low stat.
My mage was created w/ 2nd ed rules (I don't think she could have been a mage in 1st ed because of the dex, if memory serves), with a 4d6, drop low--I took one look at the numbers, and immediately saw the mage jump out of the stats I rolled.
She had STR--12, DEX--5, CON--16, INT--17, WIS--12, CHA--11
I like it when a character emerges that clearly from a set of numbers (though the stereotype would have been to put that 5 in STR instead).
I guess the question is whether you consider a character with a single low stat to be "underpowered" or not--and I guess I don't. To me, it wouldn't be quite as much fun to play a character with every stat 15+--that would be seriously overpowered, and just seems like everything would be less of a challenge, and would get boring quickly.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.