G
Guest 85555
Guest
Your entire argument is based on this idea that all art will become grey, bland, and pointless (like gruel) because of criticism. But art criticism has always existed. Always. Black Metal started in the 80's, and it still exists today, and it doesn't seem like criticism of it is going to wash it away in a sea of overwrought PC culture. But you want us to stop striving to do better, out of fear that THIS time we will go too far and ruin all art forever.
Again, I have no issue with criticism. I don't know why you keep saying I do. Like I said, conversations like this one are fine, and I encourage them. What I don't like is where these conversations sometimes go in terms of it becoming harder and harder for people to make the kind of art they would like to make (and not because a single criticism has been leveled, but because of the state of the culture at the moment and the way companies and publishers run away from a hint of controversy). It isn't even necessarily the critics fault (though I do think people should understand the power they wield when they go beyond criticism and bring together an active movement to have something removed or not made).
And I never said everything will be bland. I said over and over, great art can be made despite these kinds of moral restrictions being imposed on them (and I pointed to Bride of Frankenstein as an example). My contention is more that putting a priority on wholesomeness, morality and the responsibility of art to society like this tends to lead to blander art. It is what produces things like the show Growing Pains.