D&D General How do you picture your D&D game in your mind?

What's D&D look like when you play in your imagination?

  • More realistic. Kind of like old AD&D art or LotR. Kind of generic as far as fantasy goes.

    Votes: 53 86.9%
  • Anime style. My character Naruto runs when moving 60 feet or more.

    Votes: 3 4.9%
  • Victorian Era Steampunkish kind of like Eberron or Crit Role. Pew pew pew!

    Votes: 5 8.2%
  • WoW. Huge Eyebrows and Pauldrons for days.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

DarkCrisis

Sith Lord
That'd be too busy.

There is a level of detailed that's very satisfying to some people like @Charlaquin or myself.
400 was obviously hyperbole, but Liefield was/is known for added way to many adornments to his characters (in the 90s).

main-qimg-014078e706e7aaa53d3fd179c19cef8d-pjlq.jpg
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Busy is like Rob Liefeld adding 400 unnecessary pouches and guns to Cable of the X-Men. Having random belts and spikes and shoulder wings and whatever is like, how long does it take you to put that mess on? I get its just a style choice, but damn like it must take you forever to get dressed.

Does the manager from the Applebees-like restaurant in Office Space keep asking all those characters "Where is your flair!? Bob the Barbarian has on 30 pieces of Flair! Don't you want to be like Bob?"
Belts, yes, there are perhaps an excessive amount of, though I think mainly that’s because the characters need somewhere to hang all their weapons and pouches and potions and whatever other baubles they’re carrying, so I see that more or less as an extension of the effort to actually depict all the crap that’s on a typical D&D character’s equipment list on their person. Spikes and shoulder wings… I don’t really see that? Not more than your typical fantasy armor, anyway. I suppose on top of the excessive equipment and accessories it might be too much. But again, that too much is very D&D to me. If your character has two swords, a shield, a bow, and seven different bags and bottles they’re luffing around, not to mention their backpack and the 30 lbs of whatever you can stuff in there… it should take them an unreasonably long time to get dressed!
 



Mad_Jack

Hero
I choose the first option but lean more towards The 13th Warrior. Mosty for it's complete mix and disregard for what was geographically or historically appropriate for the cast to be wearing. lol

One of the things I really liked about 13th Warrior was that the group was carrying a wide variety of weapons and armor, and yet it was still mostly believable that a group of 13th century Norsemen out adventuring could have theoretically acquired all that stuff. In particular, I liked the one guy who was wearing the throwback Roman gladiator-style helmet.

He actually drew the feet. Clearly, he was feeling spicy that day.

Yeah, that's always been a pet peeve of mine - the feet. Not even just Liefeld... One of the things I dislike about a lot of the Pathfinder iconics are the triangular elephant feet that so many of them have.
 

Thourne

Adventurer
One of the things I really liked about 13th Warrior was that the group was carrying a wide variety of weapons and armor, and yet it was still mostly believable that a group of 13th century Norsemen out adventuring could have theoretically acquired all that stuff. In particular, I liked the one guy who was wearing the throwback Roman gladiator-style helmet.
Definitely, but of course some of what they were wearing wouldn't arrive for a few centuries too. Totally D&D :)
 

Vaalingrade

Legend
Yeah, that's always been a pet peeve of mine - the feet. Not even just Liefeld... One of the things I dislike about a lot of the Pathfinder iconics are the triangular elephant feet that so many of them have.
As much as I bag on Liefeld for his art... and writing... I would be in favor of no one depicting feet ever again.
 

Thourne

Adventurer
As much as I bag on Liefeld for his art... and writing... I would be in favor of no one depicting feet ever again.
It isn't the worst,I think Miller still wins that. Ugh. Some of those illustrations make me wonder if he had ever seen a human being or was just going off a description he read in a book, and poorly understood.
 

Mad_Jack

Hero
Definitely, but of course some of what they were wearing wouldn't arrive for a few centuries too. Totally D&D :)

The plate armor didn't really seem out of place, either. If anything, the one thing that seemed a bit anachronistic was the TWF ranger with his golf-bag-o-weapons on his back. (And who's actually one of my favorite characters.)

As much as I bag on Liefeld for his art... and writing... I would be in favor of no one depicting feet ever again.

I'd just like professional artists to have some basic understanding of human anatomy and perspective, so that at least they can make a stylistic choice to draw things the way they do...
 



Retreater

Legend
I know it's not exactly answering the question, but I see it removed from the fantasy. I see numbers, character sheets, charts, dice on the table, books, computer screens (if playing online), minis and grids.
For me all the wonder of imagination is gone. The curtain has been pulled back, ripped from its rod. There's nothing between the Great Oz and Dorothy.
 

Consider the classic, Golden Age superhero. Bright, saturated primary colors in bold, often simple designs. Shining ideals untainted by doubt or fault or questions about their motives or nature.

Then consider the deconstruction of this superhero. Gritty. Desaturated. Restrained. (Ignore the boob windows, pretend being risque isn't relevant here.) Often jagged or ruined or at least grimy. The dark, fallen mirror of the previous.

Now, consider the reconstruction of this superhero. Still bold colors, but a little softer, perhaps not quite so saturated. Somewhat restrained, but willing to be bright again, striving to approach the shining ideals even if sometimes they fall short. Sometimes getting dirty, but able to wash up after.

Finally, apply this concept to stuff like WoW, Pathfinder, and 4e D&D, but with Middle Eastern/Golden Age of Islam clothing.

That's what I imagine the outfits of my world looking like. Ordinary folks wearing realistic but colorful outfits. Those of stature, money, or prominence having more signature, detailed looks. The PCs being perhaps a little outlandish, but not to a distracting degree: you could mark them in a crowd if they aren't concealing themselves, but you wouldn't find their outfits cartoonish in isolation. Just distinctive and perhaps slightly melodramatic.
 

I know it's not exactly answering the question, but I see it removed from the fantasy. I see numbers, character sheets, charts, dice on the table, books, computer screens (if playing online), minis and grids.
For me all the wonder of imagination is gone. The curtain has been pulled back, ripped from its rod. There's nothing between the Great Oz and Dorothy.
That's...terribly disheartening to hear. You have my condolences.
 


DrunkonDuty

he/him
To be honest - it changes from game to game. From character to character. Even session to session. Comes down to my mood, what I've watched recently, what other people in the game are describing their characters as looking like, style and genre of the game. Although I rarely picture anyone as cartoony.

One thing I like to do is pick an actor (and a role they played) to describe what my character looks like.
 

As much as I bag on Liefeld for his art... and writing... I would be in favor of no one depicting feet ever again.
Ah we've found the one dude on the internet who doesn't want people to "SHOW FEET".


Belts, yes, there are perhaps an excessive amount of, though I think mainly that’s because the characters need somewhere to hang all their weapons and pouches and potions and whatever other baubles they’re carrying, so I see that more or less as an extension of the effort to actually depict all the crap that’s on a typical D&D character’s equipment list on their person. Spikes and shoulder wings… I don’t really see that? Not more than your typical fantasy armor, anyway. I suppose on top of the excessive equipment and accessories it might be too much. But again, that too much is very D&D to me. If your character has two swords, a shield, a bow, and seven different bags and bottles they’re luffing around, not to mention their backpack and the 30 lbs of whatever you can stuff in there… it should take them an unreasonably long time to get dressed!
It's a very overwrought and hyper-dramatic style that Wayne Reynolds uses. You've got huge, almost excessive detail, heavy, heavy anime influences (I mean one of the guys in that picture is Vampire Hunter D but with a bow), combined with Western comics influences, specifically 2000AD, which he used to work on, and was clearly influenced by the other artists there. It's definitely not at all realistic, so the idea that it's accurately depicting a D&D character is pretty far-fetched unless they have multiple costume managers (aka squires) following them around and helping them get dressed. On the other hand, you can see the realistic roots before it's taken to this excessive place if you look at British fantasy art in the 1980s and earlier 1990s. There's a sort of hint of this gear-fetishism even in stuff like Lone Wolf - and it took a while for Reynolds to get there - his earlier work was less wild.

That said, it's definitely more extreme in terms of how complex and funky their gear and outfits are than both the previous generation of fantasy art's armour, and the following one, the pink-and-purple "steampunk" one we have now. Even the art of stuff like FFXIV and WoW features less ornamentation typically (FFXIV is somewhat closer to Reynold's Pathfinder work than WoW is, I'd personally say).
 



Epic Threats

An Advertisement

Advertisement4

Top