How so? I've seen my own writing being accused of being AI when it wasn't (not to mention artists being constantly accused of it). I don't think these things are as obvious as some people like to claim, and having been on the receiving end of false accusations of such more than once, I am leery of anybody who claims they can tell.
It's more obvious in a body of work than a short paper or small packet. if there are enough signs....
When I ...
... read over 100 pages and when I see
formulaic paragraph formats. Same format over and over...
... see overly used
exposition structure (
"It's not just a dark fantasy world, it is a place to explore defeating of evil..." ) over and over
... see that most every section has a
concluding/summary paragraph.
... see that most of its words are
concat words "Ashlanders" "Shardbearer" , "Firebreaker".
There are a bunch more too...
I say this,
if I get a whiff of AI in writing and the author is using lots of AI for art = its just too much of a lie to say
"i use it for art but neeeevvverrr for text" = i call BS.
I am not saying
"never use AI for text", I am just saying, bloody well admit it.
I
read the big old books, White Wolf and
Forgotten Realms. And if you go back and read books from 1995, tons and tons of pages of blocks of text, few images, SO MUCH writing, for
Hundreds of different authors = and all in a
RPG context... there is just things that people do and don't do and the view of what is AI is a LOT more clear.
Lastly...
if I can tell AI to write YOUR rpg idea and it generates text and structure and word choice that is 90% the same... I don't feel bad calling it out for AI use.