Pathfinder 2E How is Pathfinder doing?

If the #2 TTRPG on the market couldn't sell a dozen books over a 3 day convention there wouldn't even be enough of a non-5e playing market to justify holding GenCon in the first place. Do you really think Pathfinder is so dead in the water that their showing at GenCon is a big waste of time, they won't even sell 1% of what they bring? That notion is laughable.
The "top layer" being the approximately 400 books sitting on top of the black tablecloth.
But yeah, I saw many books unsold even when Paizo premiered PF2 at GenCon. So yeah, I don't expect a mass rush on these books. I hope I'm wrong.
You are aware they have continued publishing both core; Adventure, AP and Lost Omens books since the line launch in 19, right? They didn’t publish three books and stop. Dark Archives just came out LAST WEEK, and there will be a lot of players at GenCon who haven’t had a chance to purchase that book yet.
Yes, but I'm sure each has diminishing returns.
Something being the worst format FOR YOU holds no bearing on its appeal for other players.
For "some" other players. I'm sure I'm not alone, especially when I see the amount of in-person games compared to online games.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


But yeah, I saw many books unsold even when Paizo premiered PF2 at GenCon.
They claimed it was a successful launch at the time, so clearly they were unconcerned with the unsold copies you saw.
Yes, but I'm sure each has diminishing returns.
Really? You have sure and concrete insight into sales data in this hobby that famously does not report or aggregate such data in any means approaching accuracy? Or are you just making assumptions based on your somewhat strange belief about how the game is underperforming
For "some" other players. I'm sure I'm not alone, especially when I see the amount of in-person games compared to online games.
Now you have insight into the number of in-person games of Pathfinder 2? When did you perform the census because I think you missed my group.

Retreater:
The "top layer" being the approximately 400 books sitting on top of the black tablecloth.
A selection of books comprised of the last 3 or so products in both the PF2 and SF game lines with what appears to be just a stack of each games CRB’s. Looks like a perfectly fine assortment to be selling.
 
Last edited:

Really? You have sure and concrete insight into sales data in this hobby that famously does not report or aggregate such data in any means approaching accuracy? Or are you just making assumptions based on your somewhat strange belief about how the game is underperforming
No. I just know that campaign books, books of setting information, books with specific themed classes do not sell as well as core books, which every group (and most players) need.
If you find other data to suggest that the Absalom city guide is outperforming the Core Rulebook or Bestiary, I'll happily edit my post.

Now you have insight into the number of in-person games of Pathfinder 2? When did you perform the census because I think you missed my group.
Surprisingly, yes, I've done this. When listing my PFS game on the database, it shows you the activity of organized play, and if online or in-person. PFS is much stronger online than in-person.

This doesn't even touch on the fact that my PF2 rulebooks are basically already outdated and aren't of the current printing. My PDFs though - instantly updated. My Foundry games - instantly updated.
I just don't see why people would want books. Heck, even if you are lucky enough to be able to play in person, bring the PDF or use Archives of Nethys.
And sadly, I wish I could buy the books to support the company, but there's no way I could use them.
If I don't have that content electronically, it's useless to me. If I can't put maps on a VTT, scan details into the online game, that book is just going to sit on my shelf.
 

No. I just know that campaign books, books of setting information, books with specific themed classes do not sell as well as core books, which every group (and most players) need.
That knowledge of course goes against Paizo's statements about their business where they indicate that their bread and butter is the sale of campaign books. AP's are what fuels that company and they make no bones about it, nor have they ever. So you're not quoting "knowledge" you're guessing. And your guess is based on your bias.

Surprisingly, yes, I've done this. When listing my PFS game on the database, it shows you the activity of organized play, and if online or in-person. PFS is much stronger online than in-person.
Okay, but you didn't say PFS games. You said "the number of in person games compared to online games" which is an unknowable figure. And no, comparing two listed organized play game times does not count as "surprisingly" conducting a census.

This doesn't even touch on the fact that my PF2 rulebooks are basically already outdated and aren't of the current printing. My PDFs though - instantly updated. My Foundry games - instantly updated.
Is this supposed to act as some sort of backing for your claim that books won't sell at GenCon? Because your rulebooks are never outdated because Paizo provides you with a document reflecting all the latest changes.

I just don't see why people would want books.
That's a you thing, that's not a universal truth for all players. It may not even be a universal truth for most players.

Heck, even if you are lucky enough to be able to play in person, bring the PDF or use Archives of Nethys.
Really, what other ways should I alter my play style? Please do tell me what else I can do to play my games the way the all knowing Retreater would... :rolleyes:

And sadly, I wish I could buy the books to support the company, but there's no way I could use them.
If I don't have that content electronically, it's useless to me. If I can't put maps on a VTT, scan details into the online game, that book is just going to sit on my shelf.
Look at all of those "I" statements, breathe it in for a second, then exhale as you realize that all of these - this industry, Paizo's business model, those books at GenCon - are not about you.
 

The "top layer" being the approximately 400 books sitting on top of the black tablecloth.
But yeah, I saw many books unsold even when Paizo premiered PF2 at GenCon. So yeah, I don't expect a mass rush on these books. I hope I'm wrong.

Yes, but I'm sure each has diminishing returns.

For "some" other players. I'm sure I'm not alone, especially when I see the amount of in-person games compared to online games.
I’ll need to dig it up to confirm.

But

Those extra books you saw? They shipped them in during the convention because they purportedly did sell out of the giant pile of books they had that first day.
 

My experience with PF2e is some people just want to refuse to believe it sells, it sells well and that people buy and play it. They will see piles of other RPGs sitting and Pathfinder books selling briskly but because six PF2e books are sitting they will say see, PF2e doesn’t sell because there are more copies of it still there than Shadowrun 6e.
 


It can also be easy to subconsciously or not compare PF2e sales to sales of D&D 5e, or even PF1e in its prime, which are abnormal outliers in the hobby.
Very true but I chalk pf1e up to the edition wars. The market split really started with the birth of the OSR and D20 fatigue. 4e was just a sort of thumb shaking at the 3.5 fanbase, unintentional, that didn’t help so Pathfinder became a bigger emblem of that split because it picked up those who didn’t move to 4e. I think their market is now Paizo fans and not edition warriors or 3.5 players looking to continue to use their books considering how far PF1e moved away from 3.5 as the supplement churn started and how close to 1e that 2e actually really is when you look at the entirety of the Lifecycle and Pathfinder Unchained’s various optional rules that were implemented.
 

I think their market is now Paizo fans and not edition warriors
Yeah, I think this is mostly true. In many of the PF2e communities I'm in there is a lot of 5e bashing, so the edition war is still ongoing just not between 3.5 diehards and everyone else anymore. But in general, I just like being a Paizo customer/fan more. They produce more stuff that I think is higher quality, they continually develop their lore and setting, their pre-made adventures are second to none, and in general there's a sense of a community-company relationship where there is none with WotC. Paizo would not exist without it's fans and the communities they create and Paizo acts like it, WotC could not give less of a damn about their players or the people making third party content for their game. This isn't to say Paizo has never made massive embarrassing mistakes (remember Pathfinder Online?), just that blow for blow I enjoy being a part of Pathfinder communities more so than most 5e communities.
 

Remove ads

Top