Certainly the Shire has its landed gentry, but are they D&D Aristocrats? The D&D Aristocrat represents a member of the martial aristocracy of a quasi-Renaissance society -- d8 Hit Dice, decent BAB, martial weapon and armor proficiencies, etc. Even a wealthy Hobbit seems more like an Expert to me (just like a wealthy Englishman in the first half of the 20th century).Let's also remember that Pippin was the son of the Thain of the Shire; if anyone in the Shire was an Aristocrat, he would be - he was a true "prince of the Halflings."
Qlippoth said:
Wasn't Saruman the one responsible for the storm over Caradhras? (Or am I thinking of the film rather than the novel?)
mmadsen said:
The D&D Aristocrat represents a member of the martial aristocracy of a quasi-Renaissance society
Aristocrats are the rest of the non-combatant nobility. Noble knights are typically aristocrat/fighters, capable of assuming a haughty demeanor on and off the battlefield. Kings, princes, and courtiers with no other useful skills are members of the aristocrat class.
Certainly true combat veterans would have levels in Fighter, not just Aristocrat, but the D&D Aristocrat is obviously an Aristocrat of a martial society. After all, the Aristocrat gets d8 Hit Dice, decent BAB, martial weapon and armor proficiencies, etc.I don't think everyone sees it like that.
mmadsen said:
Certainly true combat veterans would have levels in Fighter, not just Aristocrat, but the D&D Aristocrat is obviously an Aristocrat of a martial society. After all, the Aristocrat gets d8 Hit Dice, decent BAB, martial weapon and armor proficiencies, etc.
None of that seems appropriate to a wealthy Hobbit any more than it seems appropriate to wealthy gentleman in Tolkien's English countryside. Certainly Bilbo and Frodo didn't grow up training in the ways of war. Should they leave the Shire proficient with martial weapons, armor, and shields?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.