Malin Genie
First Post
I'm not too clear on how to rule illusion (figment) spells.
Simple example: the party wizard uses silent image to create a brick wall behind the party as they attempt to flee.
The enemies see a brick wall appear. At this point, as I understand it, there is no save, as they have not 'interacted' with it.
If one of them examines it, then the examination grants them a save (they are now 'interacting' with it). If they make the save, they realise it is illusory, and can now see through it as a translucent outline [phb158]. If they don't make the save, does that mean they are 'convinced it is real' and therefore have no reason to keep examining it?
[phb158] A 'character who spends a few rounds poking' is 'faced with incontrovertible proof' (as presumably would be one who ran through it) and recognises the illusion without needing to save. But should an enemy who doesn't know the spell is an illusion (although they might suspect) be allowed to 'test' the illusion by running into it or waving an arm 'through' it (therefore not having to make a saving throw?)
Perhaps more intelligent monsters, especially those who know of illusion magic, could act in that way, but what about an animal or similar unintelligent creature?
What about an enemy wizard who makes the DC16 Spellcraft check and knows that the spell cast is silent image, not wall of stone. Does she (A) automatically recognise the illusion (B) automatically get a save but if it fails 'believe' the illusion despite 'knowing' it is an illusion (C) still have to interact with it as usual to gain the saveing throw?
Simple example: the party wizard uses silent image to create a brick wall behind the party as they attempt to flee.
The enemies see a brick wall appear. At this point, as I understand it, there is no save, as they have not 'interacted' with it.
If one of them examines it, then the examination grants them a save (they are now 'interacting' with it). If they make the save, they realise it is illusory, and can now see through it as a translucent outline [phb158]. If they don't make the save, does that mean they are 'convinced it is real' and therefore have no reason to keep examining it?
[phb158] A 'character who spends a few rounds poking' is 'faced with incontrovertible proof' (as presumably would be one who ran through it) and recognises the illusion without needing to save. But should an enemy who doesn't know the spell is an illusion (although they might suspect) be allowed to 'test' the illusion by running into it or waving an arm 'through' it (therefore not having to make a saving throw?)
Perhaps more intelligent monsters, especially those who know of illusion magic, could act in that way, but what about an animal or similar unintelligent creature?
What about an enemy wizard who makes the DC16 Spellcraft check and knows that the spell cast is silent image, not wall of stone. Does she (A) automatically recognise the illusion (B) automatically get a save but if it fails 'believe' the illusion despite 'knowing' it is an illusion (C) still have to interact with it as usual to gain the saveing throw?