Pinotage said:It doesn't prove they aren't either. I'll await you answer to my earlier post, but I've yet to see an argument that prooves that feats aren't effects. And yes, I've seen the 'we don't have to prove it' but I really want to see a proof here that they are not to be considered effects.
Definately.
I would like to see a point by point proof of how a feat is not an effect as well.
Until then, the rules quote that says feats are effects rules over all.