roguerouge
First Post
When I tell fans of the series that, their response is always "You should have read more!"
Hmmmm... I didn't really like it, so you think I sould...read more? Ok.![]()
I teach television studies, so I think I can explain why they say that. What you're doing (reading a dozen comics of more than 640) would be the equivalent of walking out on a film after a few scenes or of dropping a book after 10-15 pages. Forming such an extreme judgment after experiencing something like 2 percent of the work can only be justified if the work is spectacularly bad or offensive. In addition, long form serial narrative works like comics or like television programs base many of their effects on building up slowly over time or depend on character developments that are foreshadowed in small and large ways over years. To sample a long form serial narrative is to basically deny the validity of long form serial narratives.
In short, they're saying that you're not giving it a fair reading and thus your opinion is unfounded and invalid.
Edit: And, yes, this stance makes evaluating television programs (which can be more than 100 hours in length) very laborious. I generally set my standard at a season: if a series can't catch me by then, well, I've given it a fair shake. When I had to sit through the first season of Babylon 5 and Charmed as a result, you can bet that I never fully trusted the taste of the people who recommended those programs again.
Last edited: