I agree with moritheil's assessment of the nuances of regal succession; it's likely that a kingdom would have a tradition (if not a law) that a king is only king until he dies. And even if one doesn't, so what? If a country wants to live under a ghostly despot for thousands of years, let them. Arguably, not all nations would.evilbob said:Besides the fact that I don't think everyone is turned into a petitioner when they die, this is still a good thing for people who just want to communicate with the dead. Again: no murder is unsolved! Kings rule for all of time!
As for solving murders, I'm not sure how this tactic would help much. Assume for a moment that moritheil's concern about resources isn't valid (a tenuous assumption, but it's only for the sake of argument). It might help for crimes of passion (wife kills an adulterous lover, merchant kills a competitor), but there are probably simpler, easier ways of getting that type of information (speak with dead, for instance, or good old-fashioned detective work). For something like an assassination, you'd have to assume that the victim actually saw and could correctly identify his assailant. If, for instance, a baron were killed by a hobgoblin assassin who was under the effects of greater invisibility and alter self, why would the baron's spirit know any better who killed him than the baron would have when he was alive? I don't doubt that this tactic could help solve some murders, but I think claiming it could solve every murder is stretching.
I'll consider that a hair split. Dying doesn't stop a creature from being a creature; it simply changes the creature's state of being.Joshua Randall said:A creature <> its soul. The soul ends up on one of the outer planes, not the creature. Sending contacts a creature. Therefor sending does not work on dead people.
Last edited: