D&D 5E "I would play in a 5e game with no caster classes at all" (a poll)

[TwoSix]

As per the title. Assume this is a hard restriction; this means no classes that learn any sort of spells from a spell list and have some kind of spell slots. So Fighter (no EK), Rogue (no AT), Barbarian, and Monk. A one-off ability that references a spell is OK.

Assume that some 3PP for some other non-caster classes would probably be allowed (I mean, you need a Warlord!). Classes and subclasses getting supernatural abilities are OK, as long as they don't get casting. Magic is still around in the setting, it's just in the form of magic items or other special items.

 

[Umbran]

If run by someone I know to be a decent GM, sure.

 

[GMforPowergamers]

i have both played and run this type of game...

I used the Middle Earth 5e book to run this.

 

[JohnF]

But I like the magics! (Does that make me shallow? )

 

[Reynard]

i have both played and run this type of game...

I used the Middle Earth 5e book to run this.

^^^This is the way.

 

[J.Quondam]

Yes, absolutely, with utter delight.

 

[Maxperson]

As per the title. Assume this is a hard restriction; this means no classes that learn any sort of spells from a spell list and have some kind of spell slots. So Fighter (no EK), Rogue (no AT), Barbarian, and Monk. A one-off ability that references a spell is OK.

Are paladins okay if their slots only fuel smite?

 

[Mind of tempest]

what is an eric Noah?

 

[Maxperson]

what is an eric Noah?

Trevor Noah's evil twin?

 

[TwoSix]

Are paladins okay if their slots only fuel smite?

They would have to voluntarily choose to know 0 spells, but I would cautiously allow it.