Invisible Medusa and her Gaze Attack?

shilsen said:
Yes, it is - even though it kills Greek mythology and takes its stuff :)
I do like this tactic :D
I always did think that was one of the most entertaining and best analogues to the animal companion/familiar that I've seen in a film.
Thanee said:
Apart from Beastmaster for the animal companion(s), of course. :)
I think the two Beastmaster movies were the only reason for the druids animal companion... and the familiar rules in D&D.

I don't recall the books name, but fantasy literature had some nice examples for how annoying and entertaining familiars can be. I think Rel or Old One quoted one episode once in their FG storyhours...
 

log in or register to remove this ad



phindar said:
I'll bite. Assuming the creature had darkvision and could see the illusion of the mirror, it would still be unaffected by its own Gaze Attack because it wouldn't be seeing it's reflection, but an illusion of its reflection. And the Illusion doesn't have the Gaze Attack. That's my take on it. (That's why every adventurer should have a full-length dressing mirror in their bag of holding.)

Plus, True Seeing would negate the illusion of a mirror anyway...
 





Darklone said:
Sam then?

Nah. Still not a fighter. Commoner with Profession (gardener), Exotic Weapon Proficiency (saucepan) and Everyman Hero PrC.

Why do I end up threadjacking all the time since I removed the threadjacker signature?

Does it count as threadjacking when the OP has had his questions answered?
 


Remove ads

Top