James McMurray
First Post
Sorry, I was misremembering and thinking True Res was 50k. Even at 2,500xp its way too cheap IMO.
Bloodstone Press said:Agreed.
The good news is that a focus is not consumed by the spell casting so once you have it, you can reuse it.
UltimaGabe said:That way, nobody in their right mind would ever make a spell with a costly material component into a Spell-Like Ability unless they never intended to cast it.
UltimaGabe said:No, it would cost 2500xp. That's more than an eighth of a level by the time you're able to cast it, and although it may be a bit low for such a costly spell, the rule as it is (ten times the cost in XP) is completely unusable. That way, nobody in their right mind would ever make a spell with a costly material component into a Spell-Like Ability unless they never intended to cast it.
UltimaGabe said:In other words, as it is, the XP cost is way, way, WAY too high, and the only reasoning I can find for the misprint is that they meant for it to be 1/10 the cost in XP, rather than 10 times the cost in XP. If that were the case, why would anyone pick anything with a material component cost as their Spell-Like Ability?
Rodrigo Istalindir said:Bingo. Seems pretty clear to me that that was the intent. I think SLA's are supposed to represent the spells that have been cast so often that they've become second nature -- where the wizard's skill has enabled him to tap into the forces of magic directly without the 'crutch' of memorization and material components.
James McMurray said:Combine Spell-Like Ability with Assume Supernatural ability (I think that's what its called). You spell-like ability becomes a (Su) ability. It no longer has an XP cost, and no longer allows SR.