If you think it's just one person, you don't seem to have read the entire thread.One person. Who it turns out is still here. Next?
See? Not just one person.Sure, here you go.
not for everyoneThere's report
and this leads (because it doesn't just ignore one way) to whole threads having responses that make no sense... I have twice in the last few months responded to someone who I THOUGHT was responding to me since they were right under me, but they responded to someone who has me blocked, and as such I was 'picking a fight' I didn't need to.and ignore functions?
there are pros and cons to both, and using either too much seems to be as bad as not useing themThings you learn.
I agree and wish moderation was all button up business.This is especially true when the mods become confrontational, flippant, or snarky when posting with the colored text, because then any response is cited as being "confronting moderation" or "discussing moderation in public," and the poster is immediately punished for that, with no recognition of the fact that the mods themselves were engaging in action that, from anyone else, wouldn't be allowed.
The usual response to that is, "well, then you should contact the mods privately," which misses the point. If someone is impugned in public, the remedy for that needs to be done publicly as well. Otherwise, as far as everyone else is concerned, the mods can apparently abuse their status freely, with no accountability to the community they ostensibly serve.
in the last year I have been told at least half a dozen times (most likely more) "Hey that's just your opinion and it doesn't matter" at least once when I started with IMO... like yeah, that's all we all have.You could,( but in my opinion), it's a bit silly to think adults need to clarify that they're stating an opinion.
exactly... there are some of us (I would say 3-4ish groups) that are playing similar but different games, and even when we try to talk about them people shout down others with what is 'the right way to play'I don't know about everyone here, but when I was a wee lad in grade school we had lessons on the differences between factual statements and opinions. I had to take a test and everything and I'm not really bothered when I see someone make a blanket statement like, "D&D is a great rules set for a campaign featuring a lot of subtle political intrigue." I disagree vehemently with that opinion, but it doesn't offend me. You probably get a lot of pushback because we'd have to write "In my opinion" before almost every single post here, because, you know, most of what we discuss are just opinions.
Okay, well, forget about the imagination and just accept that people have different opinions and it's usually nothing to get upset about even if it's radically different from our own.
hey look at that... someone posted opinions and then someone else is asking for a citation on an opinion.Cite?
This (and other threads) make it very clear you have beef with the staff here, because you're all over every thread like this, but one loud person doesn't equate to 'general erosion'. Honestly, I think they do an incredible job and this is one of the least toxic places on the web, despite any general increase in antagonism here and elsewhere.
So let's see your figures -- show us this 'general erosion of trust in this site's mods', because it sure as heck ain't shared by me.
You could,( but in my opinion), it's a bit silly to think adults need to clarify that they're stating an opinion.
Okay, well, forget about the imagination and just accept that people have different opinions and it's usually nothing to get upset about even if it's radically different from our own.
Yep...Pretty much this. People who disagree with a mod's personal opinion are very likely to think twice about expressing their disagreement, and may decide to hold their tongue. That could lead to frustration, and possibly to more passive-aggressive posting.