the Jester
Legend
Last night I made a ruling that annoyed one of my players and want to do a reasonableness check.
The monk pc had stunned a monster on his previous turn. On the monk's turn, he hit it and tried to stun it again. It occurred to me that there was no way to tell whether or not it worked- after all, it was already stunned.
Would you consider this a reasonable ruling?
The monk pc had stunned a monster on his previous turn. On the monk's turn, he hit it and tried to stun it again. It occurred to me that there was no way to tell whether or not it worked- after all, it was already stunned.
Would you consider this a reasonable ruling?