Azrael said:That's right, no stacking. I'm not sure where I've read it, but somewhere it says that there is a limit to inherent bonuses of +5 per stat.
DMG pg 21 under inherent bonuses.
Azrael said:That's right, no stacking. I'm not sure where I've read it, but somewhere it says that there is a limit to inherent bonuses of +5 per stat.
Tomes are, in my opinion, the dumbest magic item idea out there. I mean, once they're used, they're gone, right? So why are they sitting around in treasure hoards? What, the wizard is saving his Tome of Insight +3 for a rainy day? A little light reading on the can?UltimaGabe said:The Tomes don't follow the same formula as other magic items, and so I don't think they should be subject to the same stacking rules. (I even think the +5 cap is stupid, but that's a different story.)
I don't agree. What it actually does is ensure that PCs either have a +5 bonus or no bonus at all. If that's what they wanted, then they should have just made an inherent bonus be a +5 to a stat and not bothered with the other values.Nail said:The point of the rule is simple: limit the numbers of PCs with inherent bonuses.
As you have all amply demonstrated, the system works perfectly.
Forget the books. At 17th level, a wizard can just make scrolls. Making scrolls costs ~ 700gold and 50XP more per +1 than making the book AND you can do it 5000XP at a time instead of all at once. And he can read them for the "buyer" all at once instead of the process taking 6 days. And, given a decent Int, he can save even more money by just casting a couple of the spells himself. I have to side with the notion that these items just wouldn't exist. And, while buying the wishes would be a rarity (who sells 5k XP?), for PCs they are going to be common.The Souljourner said:Of course, if you play in a world where you can just buy these things, then it's a different story.
I think you mean +5, right? The limit on inherent bonuses? Keep in mind you could have an odd ability score.The Souljourner said:I agree that it's annoying to have a book of anything other than +4, since you know you're just wasting it... but given how rare those books really should be, it's not so bad.
TheYeti1775 said:To play Devil's Advocate:![]()
Once the score is increased then losing the tome doesn't effect his score thereby making that a permnanent adjustment to the ability score, much like the every 4th level adjustment.
Thereby no longer being a "bonus".
Pielorinho said:Nobody should make those books except maybe to sell to specific customers, and those customers should read the books right away.