cybertalus
First Post
I guess I disagree with all the people who say automatically evil. You talk about destroying the world and I think "crazy", or "demented", but not necessarily evil. Every reason I can think of why someone would want to destroy the world or all of existence basically boils down to a drastic overreactive solution to a problem. Kind of like killing the patient to cure the disease. Sure it technically works, but it loses sight of the object of the exercise.
With that in mind, if there's no malice behind the destruction, I'd vote not evil. If there's some kind of benevolent intent ("fulfil the prophecy and this world will be destroyed, only to be reborn into a world without pain"), it could even go good. Crazy good, but still good. Of course if the cult is actually right about such a prophecy, then they're possibly not even crazy.
With that in mind, if there's no malice behind the destruction, I'd vote not evil. If there's some kind of benevolent intent ("fulfil the prophecy and this world will be destroyed, only to be reborn into a world without pain"), it could even go good. Crazy good, but still good. Of course if the cult is actually right about such a prophecy, then they're possibly not even crazy.