I've got the 3.5 PHB in front of me

[Nebuchadnezzar]

We care for you, Roy, we really do. Please, please, please give us what we want.

 

[jmucchiello]

Therefore, I suspect that ITWF will have a prereq of BAB +6, for all characters.

But this is merely speculation on my part.

This is most likely correct since that's how ITWF and GTWF work in d20 Modern.

Originally posted by Psion
I was hoping this one (spell focus nerfed to +1) wasn't true.

Ah, well. First house rule of the revision goes down...

Ditto.

 

[Krellic]

Roy mate, keep your head down. The only way you're going to be able to answer all the questions flying at you is to devote the next few weeks to regurgitating the contents back to us.

Kudos for trying though!

 

[BVB]

What does Improved Feint do?

I second this question; I've got a finessing, bluffing fighter who might benefit from this.

Improved Feint details, please?

 

[Sejs]

What does Improved Feint do?

I'm guessing it'll let you feint in combat as a move-equivalent action instead of the normal standard.

 

[JDWiker]

My office got an advance copy. I don't have time to read it now, but thumbing through it I will say that it's interior contents look A LOT like the interior contents of the 3.0 version. The artwork is mostly the same (pictures for gear, races, and iconic characters). The chapters are laid out in the same order. Really, it's going to have a comfortable feel to it because it looks so much like what we already have (right down to the artwork of Lidda's burnt face while misuing a magical device).

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this, but, Roy, you should really think again about posting this information. I'm sure you're feeling like Santa Claus right now, with all the people you're making happy, but if Wizards takes offense--and at this point, you really don't know whether they do or they don't--you could be seriously jeopardizing your "office's" ability to ever get advanced copies of any Wizards products again. Obviously, I don't know what your office does, but not receiving advanced copies could potentially be a very bad thing for them.

That's assuming that Wizards particularly cares, mind you--the release being so close and all. I'm certainly not trying to imply that I speak for them, by any stretch--only that you might not have considered the potential drawbacks of posting information that's still technically confidential.

(This opinion, of course, is predicated on the notion that we give you the benefit of the doubt as to the veracity of your claims, as Eric suggests. I really don't know whether you're pulling our collective legs or not.)

JD

 

[BVB]

Re: Re: I've got the 3.5 PHB in front of me

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this, but, Roy, you should really think again about posting this information. I'm sure you're feeling like Santa Claus right now, with all the people you're making happy, but if Wizards takes offense--and at this point, you really don't know whether they do or they don't--you could be seriously jeopardizing your "office's" ability to ever get advanced copies of any Wizards products again. Obviously, I don't know what your office does, but not receiving advanced copies could potentially be a very bad thing for them.

That's assuming that Wizards particularly cares, mind you--the release being so close and all. I'm certainly not trying to imply that I speak for them, by any stretch--only that you might not have considered the potential drawbacks of posting information that's still technically confidential.

(This opinion, of course, is predicated on the notion that we give you the benefit of the doubt as to the veracity of your claims, as Eric suggests. I really don't know whether you're pulling our collective legs or not.)

JD

What's it matter to you what Roy does?
His choices; his consequences.

 

[Drezden327]

Re: Re: I've got the 3.5 PHB in front of me

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this, but, Roy, you should really think again about posting this information. I'm sure you're feeling like Santa Claus right now, with all the people you're making happy, but if Wizards takes offense--and at this point, you really don't know whether they do or they don't--you could be seriously jeopardizing your "office's" ability to ever get advanced copies of any Wizards products again. Obviously, I don't know what your office does, but not receiving advanced copies could potentially be a very bad thing for them.

That's assuming that Wizards particularly cares, mind you--the release being so close and all. I'm certainly not trying to imply that I speak for them, by any stretch--only that you might not have considered the potential drawbacks of posting information that's still technically confidential.

(This opinion, of course, is predicated on the notion that we give you the benefit of the doubt as to the veracity of your claims, as Eric suggests. I really don't know whether you're pulling our collective legs or not.)

JD

Well so far everything he has posted seems to check out and Andy Collins just confirmed the whole power attack change on his boards, so I'd say it's pretty safe to say he is telling the truth. Now, if we would just tell us more .... Where O Where is our new friend Roy today, with his gifts on information??

 

[Shard O'Glase]

I agree with JD, and maybe Roy does as wll considering the pause in him coning back to this thread. And I don't care what Roy does but that doesn't mean I want to see someone get screwed and maybe put their job in jeapardy over some eager fans of a game.

 

[Kershek]

Or perhaps he sees all the requests, his jaw drops, and then says "This will take a while, so I'll get to that later"