• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

I've got the 3.5 PHB in front of me

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont know if I believe the guy when he says he has 3.5, but I do know that it's been covered on the radio show that most of the old art is in the new book. THAT SUCKS!
 

log in or register to remove this ad


kreynolds said:


By reading some of the posts above that already address this possibility. ;)

Oh, and there's also that whole "faith" thing... :D

Heh.

Faith?

...anyway: none of what has been "revealed" is new or unpredictable information. You'll note how little this Roy character has actually said.

Again: How do you know this is legit?
 

Nail said:
Heh.

Faith?

Sure. Works for some people. Not me, but it works for some people. :D

Nail said:
...anyway: none of what has been "revealed" is new or unpredictable information.

I think that the 3.5 PH being so completely disorganized, which explains why he simply can't manage to find the scribing costs of spells, is pretty new. ;)

Nail said:
Again: How do you know this is legit?

Didn't say I did, and there's a reason for that. :cool:
 

Nail said:


Again: How do you know this is legit?

I don't, but I don't think it hurts to give the guy the benefit of the doubt. If we treat him well, the worst that could happen is we feel foolish when the falsehood is revealed, while the best outcome is that he provides information we want. The benefit of believing outweighs the drawback of doing so, at least to me!

Plus I usually have pretty good instincts on stuff like this, it sounds legit to me. The guy has almost 200 posts, he's been around for a while.
 


Heh, look how many posts I have. I have been around here for quite a long time. I just don't always have time to post on D&D stuff. I am trying to change that lately though. If I were to post something like this and was accused of lying then I'd just give a healthy F you and make you all wait on the information for over a month. If you give the guy the benefit of the doubt, then at least you are getting "something". Plus, accusing someone of being a liar in things like this will only give them the right to come back and say "I told you so!" when the books actually come out.
 


Oh yeah, and Roy, I wouldn't worry about any NDA. If there was an NDA for the book, then you would have had to agree to it either electronically or by signing something. Since you have obviously done neither, even if there was some sort of NDA, it doesn't apply to you since you are totally unaware of it, and you never agreed to it.
 

So far, I think he is correct.

But I do think he has missed part of the scribing costs thing.

But without breaking my NDA, I'll just say I think he is truthful.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top