Sure. I think the cleric, druid, sorcerer, and wizard can all be completely viable in the majority of campaigns while running strictly core, simply because of the spells. I think it's the other classes which really need non-core material to stay in the running as one goes up in levels, since otherwise they get overshadowed very fast.Joachim said:Shilsen, I won't disagree with the fact that she would be less powerful (losing versatility has that effect). That would be foolish, and dishonest. But her build as a pure core character would still be very, very viable in this campaign arc.
JollyDoc said:Daelric's wanton use of spells with the Evil descriptor gradually turned his lilly-livered soul black as midnight. As for Marius, he was officially CN in the beginning, but you know how it goes...slaughter a few innocent bystanders, become a thrall of Graz'zt and before you know it, you're plucking the wings off of pixies and signing your name with a 666!
PS...it's great hearing from all you lurkers out there. Don't be strangers!!
LordVyreth said:Psh, is that all? So if he spent a month summoning a few celestials a day, would he get kicked back to neutral or even good?
Wait, what spells are we talking about? I don't remember him using many in the recaps in the first place. That's a bit of a sticking point for me. If the spell was evil for its tendency to cause more pain and suffering than, say, being burned alive in a fireball, I could see it. But others, like summoning evil outsiders, don't strike me as that bad, at least if they're used for good purposes. So is anyone good at this point, or ever for that matter? Octurus and Samson are the closest I think you guys came.
Evilhalfling said:Another avid thread lurker ...
Burningspear missed Avasculate from the list on non-core spells. Its really deserves its [evil] descriptor.
That would be the warhulk's fault, mostly.carborundum said:>CHOKE!<
52 Strength![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.