Paying a person to go away / retire / golden-parachute, and future money will move through a different channel nowhere near that person, is a reasonable solution to the problem of separating the noxious person from the IP &c. It will not happen for free.If JG goes under due to people not wanting to give money to its owner, supporting a company which has bought the IP from JG's owner has the same effect, surely? So I'm not sure what the ethical route would be for a customer who (a) wants JG material and (b) doesn't want to support its current owner.
Jennell Jaquays has always been a favorite designer of mine, and I look for anything she's worked on.I was about to say, there are a lot of worse ways to honor the legacy of JG without supporting JG directly than by supporting whatever it is Jennell Jaquays is up to these days. Looks like this is probably the best outcome one could have hoped for beyond completely scrapping this product. While I would have gone with different charities personally, I think this is probably the best we could have asked for.
Not exactly timely... but then I'm sure there was a lot of back-and-forth and probably some legal stuff involved in getting to this point.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.