Okay, in one game I'm playing a LG Hobgoblin Fgt4/Clr1 and I'm basically an archer with all the archer feats. I plan on continueing as a Cleric since I've recently started worshipping Heironious, the god of Valor in Greyhawk.
I also am about to start a Kalamar campaign and wanted to use this guy as an NPC since none of my players know him and Hobgoblins fit in Kalamar really well, plus everyone has their own PC's they love.
Here is the rub. In Kalamar the god that Heironious would translate into forbids their Clerics from using ranged weapons? What's up with this? What is dishonorable with ranged weapons? Flamestriking someone is okay, but shooting them with a crossbow isn't? Obviously I could just house-rule it and I probably will, but what is the reasoning behind not allowing ranged weapons?
I'm new to RPG's (only ever played D&D), so I didn't know if this was a common theme or what. Is it common in novels for honorable types not to use ranged weapons?
Thanks.
I also am about to start a Kalamar campaign and wanted to use this guy as an NPC since none of my players know him and Hobgoblins fit in Kalamar really well, plus everyone has their own PC's they love.
Here is the rub. In Kalamar the god that Heironious would translate into forbids their Clerics from using ranged weapons? What's up with this? What is dishonorable with ranged weapons? Flamestriking someone is okay, but shooting them with a crossbow isn't? Obviously I could just house-rule it and I probably will, but what is the reasoning behind not allowing ranged weapons?
I'm new to RPG's (only ever played D&D), so I didn't know if this was a common theme or what. Is it common in novels for honorable types not to use ranged weapons?
Thanks.