Kingdoms of Kalamar Atlas

[Arnwyn]

I agree with cyric. This is a questionable review. I don't understand this mindset of d20 players who seem to expect maximum utility from *every* d20 product for whatever campaign they're playing in - even if it's a campaign-specific sourcebook. Ridiculous.

 

[Cyric]

[No message]

 

[Cyric]

thanks anrwyn!
psion: in my opinion the result of the review is not ok, because the only "bad thing" about the Atlas is the "Kalamar factor". I would vote for a deletion. Thanks!

 

[JeffB]

I don't know if the review should be pulled but I do think dropping the score because a Kalamar product focuses on Kalamar is just plain silly.

That being said I'm not a Kalamar fanboy (though I do like the setting) and don't even own the Atlas.

Would the D20 MR reviewers insure that the FRCS would be slighted on score because it dealt too much with Faerun?

 

[Wraith101]

That is a very good point JeffB!

Don't delete the review though as everyone has a right to an opinion ( I both own and use the Atlas heaps).

What we should do though, is write our own reviews and bring up the score a bit (if you believe as I do, that this is a cool product).

 

[geoffrey d`glanville]

I think this to be a very strange review; the Atlas looks just GORGEOUS and is of course a KoK product; never heard of a Forgotten Realms product gotten critizised for not being generic. Something a beautiful as this has never been done before in terms of maps, and all that by a comparatively small company as Kenzer.
Sorry, but really a questionable, strange review.