Latest RotG

Legildur

First Post
I've just read through Skip's latest Rules of the Game:

Unarmed Attacks (part one)

And I'm not impressed (my emphasis).

An unarmed attack provokes an attack of opportunity.
The creature you target with your unarmed attack gets an attack of opportunity against you, provided that it is armed (that is, holding a weapon, has a natural weapon, or has the Improved Unarmed Strike feat). Other foes that threaten you don't get attacks of opportunity against you.

Technically, the creature you attack gets an attack of opportunity against you even if you're not in the area it threatens (or when it's too small to threaten the area around it) because you're reaching into its space to make your unarmed attack. For example, if you're size Medium and you use your 5-foot reach to make an unarmed attack against a Tiny creature (reach 0 feet) that has a weapon (natural or otherwise), you provoke an attack of opportunity. If you've ever tried to pick up an angry cat, you'll have no difficulty appreciating what the rules are trying to simulate here.
What's this 'technically' stuff? You have to threaten in order to take an AOO. I know it is a popular house rule however and has some merit, but it is not 'technically' by the rules.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


hong said:
When was the last time anyone was impressed by one of Skip's ROTG articles? ;)
<sigh> probably a while back, but I hate it when people then trot them out as RAW. I wouldn't have minded so much if he had of said "well, the rules don't say so, but we play it that ....".
 

We've just had a flamewar over on rec.games.frp.dnd caused by one of Skip's "clarifications": do non-combat-trained horses run away or not when you fail the ride check to control them?
 

jasin said:
We've just had a flamewar over on rec.games.frp.dnd caused by one of Skip's "clarifications": do non-combat-trained horses run away or not when you fail the ride check to control them?
LOL! I reckon they should just hire Hypersmurf.

Then if a rules adjudication throws up an odd result, they could errata the rules and run that past him to make sure that there are no unintended consequences.

I wonder if all this will be any better with 4E? Doubt it, probably just different issues.
 

Remove ads

Top