Braveheart was epic? A cool action movie with little basis in fact beyond names. I enjoyed the movie but I'd not call it epic.Wayside said:
So has Braveheart just fallen off in popularity or what?
I would. Just because a film has little historical fact in it doesn't take away from it's larger-than-life feel. It was a movie that had action in it, but that's not what made it a quality epic movie. Just part of it.Black Omega said:Braveheart was epic? A cool action movie with little basis in fact beyond names. I enjoyed the movie but I'd not call it epic.
John Crichton said:216 minutes, about 3 1/2 hours. I recall it didn't do that well.
It could have been as I have never seen the film. It also could have just been a big pile of poo.krunchyfrogg said:Re: Gods and Generals
I know we're not supposed to talk politics here, but G&G was heavily biased politically, and I think that fact might have a big part in it not doing very well also.
krunchyfrogg said:Re: Gods and Generals
I know we're not supposed to talk politics here, but G&G was heavily biased politically, and I think that fact might have a big part in it not doing very well also.
kkoie said:rumor has it now that the film, at its current state, is 4 hours and 20 minutes long. the same scooper said that P. Jackson implied that because audiences didn't have a problem with 3 hour films like FOTR and TTT, that ROTK would stay close to its 4hr+ variation.