darkelfo
First Post
domino said:Huh. Can you stack that?
This item can only be used by a CG bard, for 3 times the 30% reduction?
I don't think the alignment AND class restriction reduction stacks, but its to the GM.
domino said:Huh. Can you stack that?
This item can only be used by a CG bard, for 3 times the 30% reduction?
What is there to elaborate on? It states in the descriptions of Bag of Holding and Portable Hole that putting the one into the other makes things explode. That's it. Easy enough: don't combine Portable Holes and Bags of Holding.darkelfo said:Can you please elaborate on this point? I read the above post. Do extradimensional spaces conflict only when it so states in the description? Handy Haversack, for example, does not mention that it does, but it describes the Haversack as similar a Bag of Holding.
Well except for that ambiguous bit of text in the description of the Rope Trick spell.Felix said:because there is no rule saying "extradimensional + extradimensional = boom". It's a myth. All clear?
However, there are no rules stating why it is "hazardous" to do such a thing. Furthermore, the Bag/Hole interaction is between a nondimensional Bag of Holding and an extradimensional Portable Hole.System Reference Document 3.5
Note: It is hazardous to create an extradimensional space within an existing extradimensional space or to take an extradimensional space into an existing one.
True, true, but I think that's a doorway for DMs to house rule away since there's no follow up rules for it.Well except for that ambiguous bit of text in the description of the Rope Trick spell.