LEB Discussion Thread '10 Pt 2

[Velmont]

Just a word that I will be off all the week-end and back on Tuesday only. Good week-end everyone.

 

[Walking Dad]

Edit: Sorry, wrong sub forum.

 

[WEContact]

OOC: Hey @WEContact , I hope that means you're back. Just saying you were a great new member of the boards and was sorry to see you go.

Ah, I see. Well, I don't have internet access at my new home yet. I suppose that when I do I'll be able to come back.

 

[stonegod]

FYI: r1's out all with due to critical damage by the Canadian Tax Code. He should be through with his extended rest next week.

 

[KarinsDad]

FYI: r1's out all with due to critical damage by the Canadian Tax Code. He should be through with his extended rest next week.

What a wussy!

That's a short rest at worst and for some people, just a standard action.

 

[renau1g]

Yeah, I'm frail, I only have an 8 Con (it's my dumpstat )

Anywho, I'm back and after a rather enjoyable long weekend ready to continue on (and hopefully take down some PC's here )

 

[dammitbiscuit]

Hello! I ran a big Eberron campaign in 3.5 way back in the day and I'm starting to miss this setting. Eberron and Dark Sun are the only breaks I've had from "Generic Fantasy" (Faerun, Points of Light, Greyhawk, etc) and I enjoy that greatly.

I would like to try playing with you guys, if there's room.

I enjoyed an Iron Soul Halfling very much in the RPGA, even if the adventures were boring as possible - I'm somewhat curious what Centered Breath would be like.

I'm also a huge fan of warlords, but on the wiki it looks like you guys have a LOT of leaders already. If I played a 'lord, I'd probably go for some sort of a Lyrandar or Lhazaar "artillery commando" or "first mate" sorcerer/warlord. He'd be the good kind of leader - enabling swift violence instead of dragging things out for weeks of game time via too much focus on healing and defensive bonuses.

Or if there is a dearth of violent murderizer PCs, I could go for an Avenger with ties to the Silver Flame, Valenar, or both.

I've read through a bunch of the wiki, but not all, and a tiny sliver of the forums, but please feel free to nudge me in the right directions!

 

[FourMonos]

Just an FYI, I'll be leaving town today and traveling until July 28th. No computer access. Thanks.

 

[dammitbiscuit]

Thank you all for the exp, lol. I was actually hoping more for a tip on which character to play... barring that I decided to go with the most versatile one (the sorcerer warlord), who can help out as a leader or as a striker. The other ideas are more focused and thus potentially redundant in a less balanced party.

I'm slowly learning the wiki format and adding Davkas to it. He's Lhazaarian! He does not like pina coladas. His daddy was cast out of house lyrandar and his mommy was a salty pirate - First Mate of the Bonny Couatl.

Man I hate these things. Whatever happened to just hosting your sheet at Myth-Weavers and the like? These "living X" wiki sheets are more of a coding project than a character sheet.

 

[Son of Meepo]

Man I hate these things. Whatever happened to just hosting your sheet at Myth-Weavers and the like? These "living X" wiki sheets are more of a coding project than a character sheet.

While I'm not sure why certain decisions were made about the format of the sheet, the general idea was to have as much information visible to others so that they can make sure everything is on the level.

Before a character can earn rewards for his adventures the character sheet has to be approved by two LEB judges. This is a verification process to make sure your character is created correctly. After each adventure, assuming you have leveled up, your character has to be approved again. I think part of making it more difficult on you was to make it slightly easier on them.