"swap out one tool or skill for another without messing anything up"
I'm a little suspicious of this, frankly, and think it will likely slip easily into game-creaking gimmicks. .
1. It can't be saying you can swap a skill for a tool (or, more regularly, the reverse) -- it has to mean skill for skill, tool for tool. I don't see many characters hesitating to lose their artificer's tools to get, well, proficiency in any skill in the game. I understands some tools are effectively skills -- Thieves tools. But "gaming set" and "musical instrument" simply don't measure up.
2. I suspect it also has to be "when talking about backgrounds": if the Bard still ends up giving tool proficiencies in three instruments, you shouldn't be able to instantly lose two of them and take poison and disguise (for example).
that's my take.
I'm a little suspicious of this, frankly, and think it will likely slip easily into game-creaking gimmicks. .
1. It can't be saying you can swap a skill for a tool (or, more regularly, the reverse) -- it has to mean skill for skill, tool for tool. I don't see many characters hesitating to lose their artificer's tools to get, well, proficiency in any skill in the game. I understands some tools are effectively skills -- Thieves tools. But "gaming set" and "musical instrument" simply don't measure up.
2. I suspect it also has to be "when talking about backgrounds": if the Bard still ends up giving tool proficiencies in three instruments, you shouldn't be able to instantly lose two of them and take poison and disguise (for example).
that's my take.