[Major OT] Spyware and Monitering in next wave of computers.

Xarlen

First Post
Check this out: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html

Here's some highlights:
There is a downside too. There will be remote censorship: the mechanisms designed to delete pirated music under remote control may be used to delete documents that a court (or a software company) has decided are offensive - this could be anything from pornography to writings that criticise political leaders. Software companies can also make it harder for you to switch to their competitors' products; for example, Word could encrypt all your documents using keys that only Microsoft products have access to; this would mean that you could only read them using Microsoft products, not with any competing word processor.

The Palladium announcement implies that the Microsoft product will support this: you will be able to configure Word so that it will encrypt all documents generated in a given compartment on your machine, and share it only with other users in a defined group. Corporations will be able to do this too, to make life harder for whistleblowers. They can arrange that company documents can only be read on company PCs, unless a suitably authorised person clears them for export. They can also implement timelocks: they can arrange, for example, that all emails evaporate after 90 days unless someone makes a positive effort to preserve them. (Think of how useful that would have been for Enron, or Arthur Andersen, or for Microsoft itself during the antitrust case.)
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Xarlen said:
Corporations will be able to do this too, to make life harder for whistleblowers.

I know I may just be adding to the wild speculation, but I have heard of this new invention that allows you to text from your computer to paper?! I believe it is called a "printar" or something like that.

On a more serious note- IF this comes to pass, then there are other chips out there besides Intel. There are other OS's then microsoft.

There also very savy people that will figure out how to alter the MS OS so it does not perform that way.

Good air in. Bad air out.

SD
 

Originally written by the site in that link up there
Cheating at computer games could be made more difficult.

These people...are the purest form...of evil. How will I complete games without Invincibility? NOOOO!!!!

But seriously, if this is true, it is a dark, dark day for Rights to privacy.
 

My feeling? Let 'em.

I don't buy Intel chips anymore anyway and I'll switch to Mac or Linux (or use an older MS OS) if Microsoft pulls some kind of "Intel compatability only" crap. As far as making this "Fritz chip" mandatory for all consumer electronics, ain't gonna happen. Senator Hollings can push TCPA all he wants, it still has to get by the Supreme Court and they are very cautious regarding technology legislature.
 

How many remember the V-Chip proposal?

As for Fritz, when someone points out the possibility of suing say for a company stealing or destroying work done using that program. Then the project will be quietly destoyed.

Besides how many companies, banks, or goverments for that matter want a computer with a built in bug/exploit?

-Angel Tears
 

Lets all hope that the Republicans get their revenge on the Hollywood-led anti-war, anti-Bush movement and ensure that the law doesn't go out of its way to protect Hollywood at the expense of consumers.

Silly Hollywood...they are all about high taxes and weak protection of business and property rights until it starts hitting THEIR bottom lines. Then they suddenly get downright Orwellian.
 
Last edited:

I think that this could have a horrible backlash (it's been around for years). To many people are already up in arms about things like this and they haven't even done it yet. This would also force every computer to be a online all the time computer, that's going to be trouble right there. It also goes against the antitrust settlement that Microsoft weaseled into (I'm sure they really don't want to give any reason for going back to the original judgement in that case.). I mean it would basically give them access to every computer worldwide, that just isn't going to fly no matter how they try to word it. The futere will see huge changes in computer software and I expect the whole renting it online thing to happen, but for them to be able to encript my files on my computer, well that would be pushing the constitution regardless of the reasons they were giving. Then again who ever thought we would have a office of homeland security. It could happen.
 

A couple of relevant quotes: I'll leave you to guess at who said them.

"Government is instituted no less for the protection of property
than of the persons of individuals."

"That government alone is just which impartially secures to
everyone whatever is his own."

So, the dilemma is this: if a user buys software, does that user have the right to distribute copies that software? Whose claim to ownership is stronger, the person who bought the rights to one copy, or the person (entity) that created the item?

It seems clear that any software purchase is a one-copy transaction, although most software allows for personal copies to be made, but not distributed. This last is the main point, and I believe what justifies either government or software creators in protecting their property with such measures as described above. As the MS brief said so succinctly, "If you don't want to abide by the policy, you don't have to accept the information [install the software, download the music file, etc. --my clarification]."

As Bill said, let's start making China pay for its software. Hell, taxes on the income that would generate could probably pay off the national debt. :)
 

d20Dwarf said:
As Bill said, let's start making China pay for its software. Hell, taxes on the income that would generate could probably pay off the national debt. :)
It will simply make them speed up the production of their own OS. They already have one "red flag" linux, and I read (rumors) that they are working on windows clone.
I seriously doubt any non-us country will be happy to use an OS with a built-in NSA backdoor:D.
 

Aloïsius said:

It will simply make them speed up the production of their own OS. They already have one "red flag" linux, and I read (rumors) that they are working on windows clone.
I seriously doubt any non-us country will be happy to use an OS with a built-in NSA backdoor:D.

True, India's gov. already told MS "No we are not going to use .Net, we are going with open source."
 

Remove ads

Top