Matt Colville's Community

True discussion is inherently conflict-laden, because it's about attempting to find a path forward through an inherent disagreement. Trying to find compromise in disagreement is a conflict right up until both sides agree on the compromise.

Like this post I'm replying to right here, that you just made, is obviously intended for conflict.
Sometimes it’s possible to be agnostic and someone tells you something you find interesting.

If someone tells me about something they like, and I ask why they like it and i listen and ask some more probing questions and they answer them… that’s still a discussion.

I don’t know about True Discussion. It sounds like something students do after a two bottles of wine at 3am in the morning…
 

log in or register to remove this ad


I have to disagree with the premise of this thread because I'm firmly in the camp that Gygaxian Naturalism will produce the strongest community in the long term.

 

Remove ads

Top