MavrickWeirdo
First Post
Dragonbait said:Notes that the artwork is hosted on furnation and declares that MavrickWeirdo's name is now very appropriate. He then demands that Mavrick be banned because of Mavrick's possible association with a person whom may or may not be an artist of anthropomorphic characters, which in the net world is one of the three internet sins. At the same time he declares the banning, he surfs the web in another window for furry fetish porn to enjoy.
I regret to inform you that you have wandered ONtopic
Nyaricus said:I start a thread talking about how (d20 furry sex roleplaying is teh best / 4th edition is coming and will r00l 3.x / 5th edition, likewise, will fix all of 4th editions blatant design problems and lead us into a new Golden Age of gaming / Intellifilter was a good idea and that I want it back on the boards [and BTWards are the best class!
ce yourself for their onslaught of ar
e might!!!!] / Keen and mproved Crit shouldn't stack / high level fighters are teh suck /
ards/Wizards doesn't care about it customers and is losing money / magic items ruin the game and there is too much character reliance on them / my hat of d02 kno no limit / so on and so forth) and say that this is the best line of thought and that other people are so dumb and misguided by thinking any other way and that you should eb ashamed your DM taought you that way and with relish I tell you that this is obviously the right way to think, and that you are a troglodyte to think any other way. Obviously.
![]()