Michael Morris
First Post
Technik4 said:Unless you rewrite it, there already exists a 2nd level spell that will counter all but 2 9th level spells ...
Although Silence could conceivably stop 9th level spells, I think its a stretch to make it sound as powerful as you do. The biggest weakness is it only prohibits Verbal spellcasting, so if you have any silent spells memorized or the appropriate feat, you can get around that. Second, only Bards and Clerics have access to it, which limits how often it will be used as a counterspell.
Theory v. practice. In theory silent spell thwarts silence counterspelling - in practice very few spellcasters take that feat or use it. 95% or more of the spells in the PHB have a verbal component.
Finally:
An unwilling creature can attempt a Will save to negate the spell and can use spell resistance, if any.
Sorry, but that only applies if you're character is stupid enough to actually target the creature. If you only want to counterspell with silence you target "a point in space" in which case there is no save and no spell resistance.
I'm not saying I don't like the concept of Dusk counterspells, but I think most counterspells should only counter their level or lower in spell level (especially if there is no save or SR allowed). With 2 casters dedicated to stopping a heavy magical threat (say, a single Wiz15) the other 2 party members are free to wail on him.
And how many spellcasting BBEG go against the party alone? Not many successful ones. I've tested this concept for sometime technik - it adds another dimension to the game but it's not overpowering. There are many ways to deal with counterspells - counterspells for one.
PS- A last thought, spells like Scraganoth were always fun. Do you plan on making any spells that are un-counterable?
Making a spell uncounterable is a feat that raises it's level by 3 (although the spell can still be "countered" by means other than counterspells).