Microsoft Buying Vivendi (Blizzard)?!?!?!

Blizzard has made millions and millions off of its computer games.

Microsoft is a computer software company, with a console business that is infinitesimal in comparison.

There is NO WAY that the next WarCraft, StarCraft, Diablo, etc. is going to be purely for consoles. Quite simply, they can make more money by producing it for both PC and X-Box.

As for Mac users...well, if you haven't seen that computer gaming heavily favors the PC market before this, then this news should pierce those cataracts you have to block out the real world. I just hope nobody decides to hang themself with their one-button mouse. BUT, we may all be surprised and see Microsoft port Mac versions of Blizzard games. After all, there's a niche market there, and Microsoft does license software to the Mac already (Word, Internet Explorer).
 

log in or register to remove this ad

jdavis said:
Is Microsoft doing anything that Sony didn't do when they beat off Nintendo and totally crushed SEGA?

Not in consoles yet, but in the PC world, you bet! Just give them time. We are already seeing a warning sign. The current strategy is to lose tons of money by selling what is basically a knock-off product in order to cut profitable and innovative competitors out of the market. Once that's done they can hike up prices and not worry about pesky innovation coming from anywhere and cutting into their bottom line (gained by selling re-hashes of the same stuff over and over again with no innovation).

Enforcer said:

As for Mac users...well, if you haven't seen that computer gaming heavily favors the PC market before this, then this news should pierce those cataracts you have to block out the real world. I just hope nobody decides to hang themself with their one-button mouse. BUT, we may all be surprised and see Microsoft port Mac versions of Blizzard games. After all, there's a niche market there, and Microsoft does license software to the Mac already (Word, Internet Explorer).

And why does it favor the PC market? Because Microsoft used it's monopoly over the desktop to strongarm OpenGL out of the market, replacing it with the proprietary DirectX. That's why. It's a pattern that is repeated over and over again in the industry (java vs. C#, media player vs. realplayer, netscape vs. IE, etc.). Far from being just a tool that M$ uses, it is actually their defacto operating strategy across the board.

Consumers would greatly benefit from an open standard, cross-platform 3d rendering programming interface. That would let us play all the games we like on whatever platform we prefer. Locking games to specific platforms is good for marketing but bad for consumers. Someone mentioned above that Blizzard is working on something that would provide such a cross-platform interface. If they get bought by M$, I can guarantee you that that will be the first project that gets the axe. I wouldn't even be surprised if that was one of the reasons explicitly why M$ is targetting Vivendi in particular, rather than another one of the big game software houses.

An open gaming platform API is one of the best things that could possibly happen to the computer industry and the effects would reverberate through the sector in many unforeseen ways.
 
Last edited:

kenjib said:

Not in consoles yet, but in the PC world, you bet! Just give them time. We are already seeing a warning sign. (snip)

Except as far as consoles go, Sony is still leaps and bounds ahead of both competitors, shows no signs of slowing down, and the X-Box failed quite immensely in the most important console market - Japan.
 

Not in consoles yet, but in the PC world, you bet! Just give them time. We are already seeing a warning sign. The current strategy is to lose tons of money by selling what is basically a knock-off product in order to cut profitable and innovative competitors out of the market. Once that's done they can hike up prices and not worry about pesky innovation coming from anywhere and cutting into their bottom line (gained by selling re-hashes of the same stuff over and over again with no innovation).

The X-Box is actually a pretty good product, the problem they are having is that they are selling them for less than they cost to make. That means they need market share, and that has to come from other game makers. Lets face it nobody is forced to buy a X-Box, they have to make people want them, Sony played the same game when they got into the game industry, Nintendo did the same too. Sega, Atari, Intellivision, Colecovision and a bunch of other smaller players have come and gone. If your box doesn't cut it or you don't have the games then you are going to fail. Microsoft has deep enough pockets to hang it there for awhile but the X-box 2 better be something great. I don't think we will ever have to worry about all those pesky innovations ever stoping in the game arena, the competition will always be too stiff. Just ask Atari.

As far as PC's go, well the company came from a guys garage, they had to be doing something right, I mean Apple had home computing all wrapped up till they blew it, one different decision on Apple's part and we would all be using Appleclones instead of IBMclones and Microsoft windows would still be in the garage. Microsoft does fight to stay on top but then again all companies do, it is just buisness, Wal Mart, Sony, General Electric, Exxon, etc.....you don't get to stay on top if you play nice. Microsoft has a huge research and development department, they do everything they can to make sure that they never stop innovating, because if they did they would be dead in the water, yes they keep putting out their own products to counter products that could beat them out, (java vs. C#, media player vs. realplayer, netscape vs. IE, etc.), it is the way things work, every company does it. Microsoft is a big bully because if it wasn't it wouldn't survive. I really don't like Microsofts buisness practices either but lets remember that every company out there does the same exact thing to some extend, and the reason they don't do more is that they don't have the power to do it, you better believe that Realplayer would love to crush all it's competiton and force their products onto computers, Netscape would love to have the power to bully lesser companies, they are part of the Time Warner big bully company that has swallowed so much of the tv and entertainment industry. What's good for the consumer never enters into the equation from any company, it all about what's good for the company. Things will change the backlash is growing and technology will eventually get away from them. The fact that they are trying to get their finger into so many pies is strictly for survival, the windows market will not last forever, eventually somebody will get linux to a point where it is viable for the average consumer, or some major company with deep pockets will come up with a alternate OS, and the monopoly is over, lets face it Microsoft will have a hard time beating out a inferior product now, ( a superior product would kill them) their reputation has been dragged through the mud, more and more people outright hate them.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top