• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Minotaur Legs...


log in or register to remove this ad



Whizbang Dustyboots said:
Bovine, because it's less common and thus more interesting.

Agreed that it is more interesting, but less common? I don't think I've ever seen an illustration or miniature of a minotaur that didn't have hooves. Seems to be the norm, actually.
 

Aeric said:
Agreed that it is more interesting, but less common? I don't think I've ever seen an illustration or miniature of a minotaur that didn't have hooves. Seems to be the norm, actually.
I meant less common among humanoids and monstrous humanoids, sorry. Hooves make a minotaur stand out.
 

If we're talking standard, MM, not-very-suitable-as-PCs minotaurs, I guess I'd pick hooves (they look monsterier ;) that way).

But, if it's a PC-friendly minotaur (a la Dragonlance CS), then I'd go with a combination of two, based on a picture in AD&D 2e Tales of the Lance boxed set -- minotaurs have human-like legs and feet, but they end in two big, hoof-like toes (instead of the regular 5 human toes). In DL it nicely solves the problem of magic footwear and makes sence since mintaurs are the best mariners on Krynn (it's hard to climb masts with hooves :)).

Regards.
 


We pretty much go with the "minotaurs have feet, not hooves" line for Dragonlance. Richard Knaak, the "minotaur guy" of the Dragonlance novelists, asserts that they have feet and so we listen to him.

Cheers,
Cam
 


beer-minotaur.jpg
MM35_PG189a.jpg

Does that do it for you?
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top