Modules: Made to Read vs Made to Run?

To me this seems disrespectful to the author(s) of said book, making a point of avoiding reading it but nonetheless trying to get the information another way, but that's just my opinion.

To be clear, I'm talking about the article in HBR by the same author.

What happens is that somebody writes an article, the business world goes all abuzz, and the author thinks (or is told) "Hey, if that could be stretched into a hardcover book it would make a lot of money." But all that "stretching" doesn't really add anything I want to read.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

And I might recommend some for the artwork, but that still has nothing to do with the point I was making about reading for the sheer enjoyment of delightful/brilliant prose.
There are many types of pleasure one can get from reading a book. Enjoying the writing is one. Interest in the content, use as a reference on a subject of interest, and art appreciation are a few others.
 

There are many types of pleasure one can get from reading a book. Enjoying the writing is one. Interest in the content, use as a reference on a subject of interest, and art appreciation are a few others.

100%

And my personal opinion is that if I'm there for the content, the reference, and the art, but not the writing itself....I'd rather have highly structured content instead of prose.
 

Of course. To me that's a referee buying a module. Even if they're in training.

Yeah. That's also one of the other big reasons I don't generally use modules.
Oh, I use them, but not always. I just got done running (most of) H2 Bloodstone Mines after a string of homebrew adventures, and the current one is another homebrew. I've also got U1 Secret of Saltmarsh* half-run, awaiting resumption if-when the current party/parties reach a logical conclusion or major break point.

* - somewhat amazingly, none of us have run or played through this one that I know of.
 

And my personal opinion is that if I'm there for the content, the reference, and the art, but not the writing itself....I'd rather have highly structured content instead of prose.
In an adventure module I'm only after content and reference. If the writing is good enough (by which I mean both readable enough and concise enough) to support that, and the editing is accurate, let's rock.

I can live without art in a module except for the rare cases where something really has to be depicted in order to be properly explained.
 


Though I'm sure their will be no consensus, I would appreciate people's views on a new template I put together for an investigative module. Don't know if I would ever publish it, but for being able to run this as well as being able to inspire some of that joy for just reading adventure ideas I would like people's opinions on the format.

 

Was someone making that argument?

It was the argument I was making, to which you responded, so I was clarifying that I was just talking about the absence of RPG supplements I would recommend to a non-gamer purely for the experience of enjoying the prose. You responded that you might recommend some for other reasons. Which seemed like a non sequitur.

Or was I missing something?
 

Remove ads

Top