Dr_Rictus
First Post
And why doesn't it lead to more monks stocking up on potions of magic fang and greater magic fang? There really are already reasonably cost-effective alternatives when you look at the cost of magic weapons. Let's compare the cost of these potions to the cost of magic weapons on a bonus-for-bonus basis:
+1: potion (magic fang) is 1/40 the cost.
+2: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 6) is 1/9 the cost.
+3: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 9) is 1/13 the cost.
+4: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 12) is 1/18 the cost.
+5: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 15) is 1/22 the cost.
Conclusion: Except for maybe that dip at +2 to +3, you should be able to have potions for more than enough fights to take you though the encounters where DR matters. It only gets more efficient if you have a druid in the party and can rely on scrolls and/or their spells, but this is not by any means necessary.
I agree that ki strike seems poorly tought-out, but any monk who uses monk weapons as his primary alternative when he's high enough level that his unarmed damage is significantly more is, I think, a bit of a fool.
+1: potion (magic fang) is 1/40 the cost.
+2: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 6) is 1/9 the cost.
+3: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 9) is 1/13 the cost.
+4: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 12) is 1/18 the cost.
+5: potion (greater magic fang, caster level 15) is 1/22 the cost.
Conclusion: Except for maybe that dip at +2 to +3, you should be able to have potions for more than enough fights to take you though the encounters where DR matters. It only gets more efficient if you have a druid in the party and can rely on scrolls and/or their spells, but this is not by any means necessary.
I agree that ki strike seems poorly tought-out, but any monk who uses monk weapons as his primary alternative when he's high enough level that his unarmed damage is significantly more is, I think, a bit of a fool.
Last edited: