Monks and DR


log in or register to remove this ad


(Psi)SeveredHead said:
What is the price on that Savage Species necklace?

The necklace is always priced as a formula: (n^2 *2000) *X +600. N is the enhancement for all the weapons, X is the number of natural weapons. So +1 flamming should be 16,600 (2^2=4, 4x2000 = 8 000, 8 000x2[weapons] = 16 000, +600).

The fact you must increase all the weapons at the same time simplifies the stating of creatures who use it and prevents the enhancement from getting very high.
 



Sejs said:
Necklace of Natural Weapons or a Bracer of Striking

+1 enhancement
Sure-Striking (+1)

DR? What?

If you get a set of bracers of striking (surestriking +1) you hit as if you had +5 fists for purposes of DR only. This is a lot less useful in 3.5, with the DR changes. You would only have +1 to attack and damage though.
 

In my opinion, it's a myth that monks do more damage unarmed than with weapons. Unless one travels with a Druid or a Ranger (or a Rogue with good UMD and the right wand/scroll(s)), getting the Fang spells can be a hassle, but an enchanted kama is almost as easy to acquire as an enchanted longsword, just far more rare on a random chart. This means that a +1 Kama will hit more often than an unarmed monk and do the same average damage as 1d8. Likewise, a +2 will do as much average damage as 1d10; a +3 as much as 1d12. Plus, hitting more often further increases the average damage.
Huh? I have a monk right now who uses a quarterstaff (nothing special, just a stick). Right now, both empty hand and quarterstaff do 1d6 damage with a 20/x2 crit threat.

At 4th level, the empty hand damage will be 1d8 vs. 1d6 for the staff. At 8th level the difference will be 1d10 vs. 1d6.

How is this a "myth"? Oh, because you're comparing empty hand to a magic weapon. I see. But even with the magic weapon, note that the 4th-level monk can do 1-8 with his empty hand and only 2-7 with the weapon. At 8th level, the difference is 1-10 vs. 2-7 (or 3-8 for a +2 weapon).

So the difference in damage is not a myth. The monk is by far better with his empty hands. If you want to compare using magic items, include the amulet of mighty fists with the magic weapon.

Quasqueton
 

Quasqueton said:
How is this a "myth"? Oh, because you're comparing empty hand to a magic weapon. I see. But even with the magic weapon, note that the 4th-level monk can do 1-8 with his empty hand and only 2-7 with the weapon. At 8th level, the difference is 1-10 vs. 2-7 (or 3-8 for a +2 weapon).
1d6+1 *is* equal to 1d8 when it comes to average damage. Sure, you won't get any hits for 8 points, but on the other hand you won't get any for 1 either. The same goes for 1d6+2 vs. 1d10.

And if you add in the Amulet of Mighty Fists (which is a non-core item), the balance starts swinging a bit toward unarmed again - but you can get a Ring of Protection and an Amulet of Natural Armor in addition to the magic kama/nunchaku/siangham if you get a magic weapon instead (since an AoMF costs three times as much as an equivalent magic weapon). Also, you can include special abilities on a magic weapon (e.g. flaming, Lawful, etc.) which you can't do on the AoMF.
 

The myth is the fact that magic enhances the weapon more than leveling.

If you deal 1d8 at 4th level with bare fist or 1d6+1 with a magic kama, the damage is same on average. The bonus to hit is not. The kama has 5% more to hit, translating to more damage over time.
 

LokiDR said:


The amulet is a waste unless you have something 6 different weapons. A monk normally only takes 1 set of iterative attacks with an off-hand for the flurry. With the neclace of natural weapons that would be (n^2 *2000) *X +600. N is the enhancement for all the weapons, X is the number of natural weapons. So +1 flamming should be 16,600.

I also believe there will be an enchantment similar to Surestrikeing to get through all DR. Someone will publish it, anyway.

The formula I derived for the Amulet of Mighty Fists is the same as yours (not including the +600 gp, which I assume includes the cost of "masterworking" two "weapons") if the target creature has 3 natural attacks. Another way to look at it is it's 50% more than buying an enchanted double-weapon.

Greg
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top