Sunsword said:I also think that all Clark is saying is he's enjoying making monsters under 4E more than making monsters under 3.X. Perhaps the amount of work & material that Clark & Necromancer have produced under 3.X should be a factor.
Nymrohd said:Recharge is quite different from probability. An action that has a chance to function is still wasted time if used and failed. A recharge power will function if it is up. Availability and probability are unrelated.
Pinotage said:Not if we're talking probability that a function is available, which is what recharge is in my limited understanding. Recharge checks every round whether an ability is available. There's a probability associated with that, based on a d6 roll.
Pinotage
PeelSeel2 said:One Hill Giant I wanted to be real challenging for most of the party, so I said it was like a hill giant version of Blaster from Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.
Pinotage said:What I'm seeing now is that 4e has open the shutters of the windows that blinded people within the 3e framework. I never thought those shutters were there in the first place.
Pinotage
Moridin said:![]()
Gooooooood, gooooooooood.
You want this, don't you?
Well, that I can understand on the other hand. That is, in most people's mind, a humanoid combat maneuver rather than an innate monster ability.Mourn said:And still do. When the Bugbear Strangler's meat shield ability was mentioned, the forums exploded with complaints about how a monster could do that, but there wasn't a way for PC to do the same.