johnnype said:A githyanki without psionics is like wizard without spells. I just don't see the point. There are inumerable other monsters and races you can choose if you're looking for just another humanoid from another plane. Why mess with something as classic as the Githyanki? It makes no sense.
Again: the Githyanki aren't without Psionics, they';re just using the core rules version of Psionics. (Which is just a different sort of SLA)
Furthermore, if you do use theXPH, then the Gith Fighter, GIsh etc are perfectly useable, and all you need to do is tweak their SLA to PLA. But if you aren't using XPH, then the XPH stats are worthless, or certainly require far more work on your part (and the writers part) to be salvageable. At the end of the day, I fail to see why erring to the former is somehow illogical: especially in a Monster Manual, which should be a relatively core book. (P)erhaps part of the issue here is the nature of MM4, and it;s "NPC book" status?)
johnnype said:I agree with Psions argument above, whould it have killed them to have just 4 pages of the book for those of us who like psionics?
Well, LIke I said above: those pages would be useless to people who don't use it, but the Githyanki fighter is perfectly serviceable to those who do. It's solid utilitarian thinking.
But the problem here seems to be that some people don't see Githyanki as core monsters but Psionic monsters: or rather, they see PSionics as Core. That's a bigger problem that only a new edition is going to fix.