• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Monte Cook's Beyond the veil - WTF? (spoiler)

Mal Malenkirk

First Post
I have bought and run Monte Cook's adventure Beyond the Veil.

It's not all that bad. A deluded ghost dragon with weird sexual habits, mad monks, a cool lair in the etheral plane... this module has a few good thing going for it.

But for a module designed by the guy who wrote the DMG, the amount of error in the use of the rules is unforgivable. And the treasure is not proportionate to the task.

Consider this;

Gaulmeth, the half-dragon stone giant has an AC of 29: (-1 size, +2 Dex, +15 natural). See what I mean? Math tells me AC should be 26. The error is probably due to the fact that a stone giant has an AC of 25. Increase the natural armor of a stone giant by +4 because of the half-dragon template and you'd reach 29, right? But the typical stone giant wears a +3 Hide armor which Gaulmeth lack.

That's not all; Gaulmeth's damage while using a Huge sundering flail +1 is 2D6+17. He has a strenght of 35. The damage should be 2D6+19.

A few others I have noticed without really looking hard:

Derrit the cleric's initiative is +2. Derrit happens to be a vampire. You see the problem? Improved initiative ain't factored in. Also, Derrit must be the only evil cleric who prepares inflict wounds spell. He prepared inflict serious wound once and inflict light wounds twice! These are not domain spell.

Derim and Tellimar, the Drow half-dragons who are both 8th level fighters, gain 8 HP due to their CON of... 14. It should be +16. Also, they have 9 feats. They should have 8 (5 bonus feats and 3 standard).

Gaulmeth's chest is trapped. A trap that offers no search DC to be detected and no disable device DC to be disarmed.

The list is long, these are simply those I could remember. If I looked closely I'm sure I'd find dozen more.

And most annoyingly to the PC, the treasure you get for your trouble is ridiculously low. When you finally face the Dragon which is the center of the story you are in for a hell of a fight. It's bad enough that he hits at +28/+23, but he also drains 1 point of STR and CON on each successful melee attack! And he his fighting on his home turf, swimming through pool of acid as if he was on solid ground.

Should you win, you'll be rewarded with a great sword of wounding +1 and some gold. Oh, and a candle of truth and a ring of chameleon power. Yipee!
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Mal Malenkirk said:

And most annoyingly to the PC, the treasure you get for your trouble is ridiculously low. When you finally face the Dragon which is the center of the story you are in for a hell of a fight. It's bad enough that he hits at +28/+23, but he also drains 1 point of STR and CON on each successful melee attack! And he his fighting on his home turf, swimming through pool of acid as if he was on solid ground.

Should you win, you'll be rewarded with a great sword of wounding +1 and some gold. Oh, and a candle of truth and a ring of chameleon power. Yipee!

Players in my campaign would consider that downright generous...
 

Re: Re: Monte Cook's Beyond the veil - WTF? (spoiler)

Morrus said:

Players in my campaign would consider that downright generous...


Hmm... a candle of truth, a ring of chameleon power, a great sword of wounding +1 and some gold.
In my game the players would at least be able to make a suit of
+2 half-dragon-stone-giant-hide-armor. :)
There is a huge sundering flail +1 also isn't there?

What the heck is the CR of the Giant O'Death?
 

Woot! MY module has less typos than Monte's! :D So far, anyways.

It sounds to me like the editor is at fault, really. That stuff should have gotten caught.
 

Have you posted this on Monte's boards? I think he'd be very interested in your feedback and should be able to issue errata quite easily.
 

Return to the Temple of Elemental Evil, another Monte adventure, also had a fair share of errors. I don't know how many of those were Montes and how many editors, but still.

Personally those errors don't bother me much. It's the other things about the product that I care more about.
 

Errors are annoying, sure, and really should be caught. But honestly it sounds like a kickass adventure with some really tough opponents and interesting environments.

As someone else mentioned, don't forget to factor in items that characters actually wield as treasure, too.

Did I hear someone say that a dragon was TOO powerful and should be made more...disposable? Grrrrrr! :mad:
 

Re: Re: Monte Cook's Beyond the veil - WTF? (spoiler)

Morrus said:


Players in my campaign would consider that downright generous...

Sounds like a Tolkien type campaign.

When my players kill a dragon ... its not a zip lock baggie of gold... it's a horde =) Generally so much so that they cannot carry it all. Granted it's not all gold but the monetary value is always very high. Magic items are also not as poor as he listed either.

Course my group doesn't fight dragons often and when they do it's pretty dangerous. To date they have never defeated one but thats the fun. If they do they will be rewarded.
 

Sounds like a Tolkien type campaign.

Unless I'm misunderstanding you here, this is a weird thing to say. Smaug's hoard (not horde) certainly wasn't small. It was a treasure that nations were willing to go to war over.
 

Piratecat said:
Woot! MY module has less typos than Monte's! :D So far, anyways.

It sounds to me like the editor is at fault, really. That stuff should have gotten caught.

Heh... Pkitty said w00t... Well, not exactly, but close enough...
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top