More Greyhawk questions


log in or register to remove this ad



johnsemlak said:
I tried to argue for a more critical look at what to regard is 'canon'. My arguemnt is if you include everything published by TSR/WotC in all editions you get a entagled mess of conflicting ideas, and plus some stuff that's not very good quality.


i agree with you johnsemlak.

anything after Supplement I Greyhawk, i view as suspect. ;)

and definitely anything after 1985 is garbage/rubbish.

but you can't post a thread anywhere on the net concerning Greyhawk and get 2 people to completely agree...unless one is a sock puppet.
 

diaglo said:
anything after Supplement I Greyhawk, i view as suspect. ;)

Now diaglo, you know that there was almost nothing about Greyhawk in the Greyhawk supplement (and using the tricks/traps and Enigma of GH illustration as the basis is pushing it...). ;)

but you can't post a thread anywhere on the net concerning Greyhawk and get 2 people to completely agree...unless one is a sock puppet.

LOL! Too true....
 

Remove ads

Top