More on Animal Companions...

Alrighty then...

After the discussion of my players able to allow a companion to leave in order to select one more in tune with the environs that the edventure has led.. or simply to replace the poor unfortunate recipeint of a beautiful Crit by the BBG... :lol:

I started looking at the companion tables in advance of the game tommorow, expecting at least one of the 2 eligible characters to seek a new companion while they are in a swampy enviroment.

Er... the companion lists sux. In a swampland enviroment, the only two eligible options are Crocodile and Dire Rat. Nothing else.

Continuing to look at the list, its very haphazard. You can get a companion Camel.. but not a Hyena. You can get a Large Shark {at 4th level}, but not a Manta Ray. Why did they limit the list in this manner?

Anyway, this has led to to the thought of redoing the Animal Companion rules in a much more simple fashion:

Animal Companions may be any Animal whose CR is equal to or lower than your Druid Class level {or Ranger class level -3}
In order to determine special abilities of the Companion, your effective level is reduced by the Companions CR {if greater than 1}

Using this, a 4th level Druid can select a Lion {CR 3..and not on the RAW lists even tho the Dire Lion is} and the Lion benefits as if the Druid is 1st level.

Doing this opens up a swampland list to:
Croc, Rat, Dire Rat, Bat, Viper, Lizard, Monitor Lizard, Raven, and {technically} Toad.

This ties into my expanded rules for acquiring a companion.. turning the 'spend a day and poof' RAW method with skill checks and effort/hazard on the part of the character better.. as a random calling will have some randomness to it courtesy of more options.

This does squish the results down, being able to have a Dire Tiger {CR 9} companion 6 levels before you could per RAW... but considering that Companions are generally considered a weak class ability at higher levels already... and I don't plan on going past 14th level anyway :p


Thoughts?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

They only have creatures in there that they have stats for in the MM, and no one wanted the monster manual full of animals.
 

Crothian said:
They only have creatures in there that they have stats for in the MM, and no one wanted the monster manual full of animals.

Hyenas and Manta Rays are in the MM, so why not the companion list?
 

I see no problem with your proposed changes. Even for animals not in the MM, it is easy to modify an existing creature. So Hyenas can be coyotes, dingos, etc...
 

DragonTurtle.. thanks for the response. The game starts in one hour... :)

or... as I type this, I am finding out that of the 5 'solid will be theres' from yesterday has turned into 2... damn

So.. I guess its not as pressing to figure out if this is a good rule....

Thanks anyway.
 

You could also allow a CR = 2/3 of the druid level, that would bring it more in line with the PHB.

Personally, I play the animal companions much differently than the book anyway, they are more 'awakened' then they are supposed to be. But then they also have their own agendas and personalities.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top