yangnome said:For me, it was a toss up between teh evil one and teh dragon hunters (this mainly because I recently picked up the Draconmicaon and have ideas swimming through my head). I think I would prefer the evil campaign though, as long as the players didn't use it as an excuse to just act stupid. I'd love to get into an evil campaign where the party has an agenda and they work together to achieve it.
If you run either of the above two via PBP, I'd be interested in playing.
Brother Shatterstone said:PA, I didn't realize you where reading that game...![]()
Not that I recommend it to anyone, my RP is horrid and I hate my character cause of it... Still like the concept I just miss fired on it.![]()
I got edited or had to edit a post for censorship reasons...Paxus Asclepius said:I'd have to say I was a little disappointed, as well, though for different reasons; with the disclaimer Isida gave, I'd hoped for a grittier game. It's evil, I'll warrant you, but not truly vile.
Brother Shatterstone said:I got edited or had to edit a post for censorship reasons...Which really left some of the vileness out of my character and left me in a whole on what to do...
![]()
I've never had an issue with the board censorship... If you do you need to go and buy Thesaurus, but to answer the question it was Isida who requested it and I edited to with out hesitation.Paxus Asclepius said:Censorship reasons? Does the board automatically exclude certain words, did Isida or a mod request a less explicit phrasing, or some of each?
Brother Shatterstone said:I've never had an issue with the board censorship... If you do you need to go and buy Thesaurus, but to answer the question it was Isida who requested it and I edited to with out hesitation.
According to Garyh, I talk to him on AIM fairly often, and this was long before the thread was started if you label it as Vile it can be Vile. So I'm rather unsure if I was pushing that boundary.![]()