Yaarel
🇮🇱 🇺🇦 He-Mage
Your post mischaracterizes my post, as if I thought his opinion was wrong. Quite the opposite.Can you explain again why you feel the need to ask another poster their opinion, and then when they give it to you you try to tell them why their opinion is wrong?
What is your end goal? Is it to convince everyone in this thread to stop liking what they like because you don't like it? Are you going to keep refuting opinions until no opinions differ from your own?
You asked...they answered. It's not a debate because it's an opinion.
I wanted to know what @Mistwell loved about the Halfling because, while I view the Halfling as problematic, I dont want a "solution" that ruins what he loves about the Halfling.
His point that Tolkien himself considered the Halfling (Hobbit) to be a Human is significant.
For any other race, the Halfling would simply be called a "subrace", and there would not be much concern about it.
However, for the Human race to call an other Human something other than a normal Human, is actual, reallife, racism.
So there are only two alternatives. Either make the Halfling a fully-Human "Ethnicity" who is part of normal Human diversity, or else make the Halfling more obviously nonhuman.
Either way, the Halfling is way too Human. The concept must officially be a Human or disambiguously not a Human.